Dr Zalmay Gulzad
U.S. Courts Taliban to Keep Nine Bases in Afghanistan Download audio file 23 June, 04:44 The situation in Afghanistan after more than 12 years of U.S. occupation is getting worse by the day. The United States continues to support and make deals with the Taliban in order to guarantee that their designs for the country are fulfilled, most importantly keeping 9 military bases in the country after the official withdrawal of troops in 2014. President Karzai and the Afghan people are tired of the U.S. double-dealing and have decided to stop all negotiations.
Hello! This is John Robles, I’m talking with Dr. Zalmay Gulzad. He is a Professor at Harold Washington College in Chicago in the Political Science Department.
Robles: Hello Sir! How are you this evening?
Gulzad: Very good, thank you very much.
Robles: First question: can you give our listeners a little bit of an update? And we’d really like to hear what you think about this situation currently in Afghanistan, especially with this kind switch of events that are happening right now, as far as Russia supporting Karzai etc?
Gulzad: The situation is that the area is totally in chaos. Afghanistan, Iran, Syria and Turkey and all these areas are in trouble.
What Afghanistan really wanted to have is: the Afghans must lead the peace talk, that was the goal. What happened was that the United States as usual, we have seen the history, the United States has this very strong alliance with the Pakistani military, and also with the Pakistani secret police, the ISI. Everybody in the world knows that Talibans are supported by the Pakistani military and by the ISI secret police of Pakistan.
So, Americans made a deal with them like: “Okay, we want to have nine bases in Afghanistan. This negotiation is going on and while it is going on, we want you to create a situation for us, to tell the Taliban to come to Qatar and sit down with us and talk, we could create something that they would not attack the American bases in Afghanistan and also would not attack the United States from Afghanistan.”
So, if that is happening, America and Taliban are going to talk, the Pakistani military and the ISI, because they are good allies and the United States is giving $2 billion a year to the Pakistani military, they said “Fine!”, they created this.
Robles: Karzai, wasn’t he agreeing to the same thing, to allow bases to remain in Afghanistan? So what happened there?
Gulzad: Karzai has agreed mostly that nine bases should be given to Afghanistan. One condition isd there that most Afghans are asking the United States, that the United States should push the Pakistani military not to support any more, while the Americans and the NATO are leaving, they should not support the Taliban, so that Afghanistan has peace. But the United States is largely saying to Afghans that we cannot do that. So, the objective is this: America wants to make a secret deal, to sell Afghanistan to Pakistan and to the Taliban and the Afghans are not going to accept it.
The other thing is the building which was dedicated to the Afghan Taliban, they’ve put the name on it: Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan, and they were flying the Taliban flag. Immediately the Afghan Government and the Afghan officials, they objected to that, that is why Karzai got mad.
Okay, this is supposed to be: you are recognizing Taliban as an entity. And Taliban also used that office to send their delegation to Iran. They were trying to use it. So, that’s why today’s situation got very bad.
Karzai says that we are not going to talk to you anymore about the American troops staying in Afghanistan until things change. So then Kerry, called Karzai in Kabul and he said that the Taliban will not fly the American, I mean the Taliban flag over the building and also they will not call it the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan.
So, the problem is this: the mistrust between the Afghan Government, the Afghan people and the United States, is because the United States always supported the Taliban, (Al Qaeda is supported by the Taliban), and the United States is having this secret alliance with the Pakistani military, even though there was some sort of election in Pakistan after which the Muslim League, which is a very religious party, won the election. But still, the military is in control.
Nawaz Sharif will become the Prime Minister, he was overthrown by Gen Musharraf in 1991. He was in jail, he was in exile in London and Saudi Arabia but he’s back now, he is the Prime Minister, but he is afraid of the military. The military is calling all the shots in Pakistan.
Robles: What are the chances right now of things being worked out, I mean where do you see the Taliban going? What is the future looking like right now?
Gulzad: The future looks like this: United States wanted to make a deal with Pakistan and with Taliban in order to get their bases, because the United States always looks for their own interests, short term.
As I said before, the nine bases are very important because they are in the north of Afghanistan, west Afghanistan, central Afghanistan, out of Afghanistan and east Afghanistan.
East Afghanistan, northeast Afghanistan is for China, north Afghanistan is for Russia, the west of Afghanistan is for Iran and the south Afghanistan is for the Persian Gulf, because it is 150 miles and they could keep an eye on the Persian Gulf, the Strait of Hormuz and all this.
The other thing is that if you look throughout the history at what the United States has done, they made quick deals with the Taliban. If you look at the Clinton Administration, when the Taliban was in power I had the pleasure to go to the White House and talk with Clinton and his wife and I told them: “What you are doing in Afghanistan, with Taliban is killing these people?”
Because the Unocal Company, which is a California-based company, contributed money to his election. Clinton made a deal with them, they said: “Okay, as long as Taliban could bring stability in Afghanistan, then there will be this pipeline which is coming from Turkmenistan through Afghanistan to the Indian Ocean.
So, Clinton didn’t give a damn about what Taliban was doing to the Afghan people and Afghan women, and all this. All he was concerned about was how this pipeline should go. He didn’t care about Democracy, he didn’t care about anything. The only thing he cared about was that this pipeline could go so that he could pay back the Unocal who gave him a lot of money in his election.
Right now, this Obama regime is doing exactly the same thing. They want to make a deal with the Devil and they are selling the Afghan people. And then…
Naturally I don’t blame Russia, I don’t blame China, I don’t blame India and all these big powers, they are very nervous because if they leave a lot of these countries such as Pakistan, everybody will arm their own ally, there will be a war. And this war is going to spread, it has already spread to Pakistan and it’s going to spread to the former Soviet Republics, Islamic Republics of Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan and Tajikistan, and that will have a major impact on the future of Russia.
Robles: And what role do you see for Russia right now, in the short term and in the long term?
Gulzad: Russia has a major role. I don’t care what people say that Russia is finished and all this kind of stuff. The people in Afghanistan and in the area are looking forward to see Russia play a major role in the politics of that area. The people of Afghanistan always had good relations with Russia. You were listening to an interview with Dr. Zalmay Gulzad.
Dr Zalmay
Gulzad spoke to the Voice of Russia's John Robles about the history of
Al-Qaeda and the Taliban in Afghanistan and about how the USSR assisted the
Afghan people and built almost everything there is in the country. Dr.
Gulzad details how the US turned their own "freedom fighters" into the very
"terrorists" that they are now fighting and he says the US wants to stay in
Afghanistan for a very long time due to its strategic geopolitical location.
Hello! This is John Robles, I’m talking with Dr.
Zalmay Gulzad. He is a professor at Harold
Washington College in Chicago, in the Political Science Department.
Robles: Hello
Sir! How are you this evening?
Gulzad: Very
good, thank you very much.
Robles: First
question I’d like to ask you. Now: you were born in Afghanistan and live in
the US, you work in the US. How do you feel about the invasion of
Afghanistan by the United States of America?
Gulzad: Let
me start with this: I was a young member of PDPA (People Democratic Party of
Afghanistan). I supported the Afghan revolution. Unfortunately at that time
I was in the United States, but I did support the revolution in Afghanistan
and I supported the Soviet Union’s support for the Afghan revolution.
There was
one Soviet Union journalist Vladimir Pozner, at the Soviet time. Him and I
did a review “Question and Answer for American people”. I was a student, I
was getting my Phd and he came to Madison Wisconsin. I know Vladimir Pozner
very well and we met.
So, my
point is that it is an aggression. These are the people who the United
States supported, they are the criminals, they’re bandits, the so-called
“freedom fighters” because they were fighting the Soviets and the communism
and all this.
And today
the same people are attacking the United States and they call them
terrorists. Why didn’t they call them terrorists in 1980s?
Robles: I’ve
been trying to get that point across to a lot of people and people are
missing that for some reason.
Gulzad: 15,000
Soviet troops were killed to fight these bandits, but the United States
always went with the short victories, went with the criminals. The criminals
that they trained: Bin Laden and the Arab terrorists, and the Pakistanis,
and all these Taliban and Mujahidin, and “they” turned against them (U.S.).
Unfortunately, this land of democracy that I live in is a joke because
nobody is asking their leader: “Why did you make that mistake.?” I used to
call them freedom fighters, today they are terrorists. How come it changed
in one day?
Robles: Do
you have any details yourself about how the Taliban got their start, how Al
Qaeda got their start, how Osama Bin Laden got his start fighting the Soviet
Army in Afghanistan?
Gulzad: 1978
Afghan revolution, the Soviet Union recognized us and most progressive
countries in the world recognized that revolution.
Jimmy
Carter was the President of the United States. He started it: with Zbigniew
Brzezinski, they started it to arm, to find the people to oppose the Afghan
state because they considered, they thought: that this is the soft belly of
the Soviet Union.
They
thought that from Afghanistan they are going to infiltrate in the Muslim
Soviet republics of Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan and Azerbaijan.
So what
they did… Now, they couldn’t find too many Afghans, very few Afghans opposed
it, because the Communist Government gave them land and everything else, so
they couldn’t find too many Afghans.
So, what
they did is they went to Anwar Sadat and to the Arab reactionary regimes,
they found unemployed Arabs, unemployed Pakistanis (the Pakistani regime was
a dictatorship, not only military, but it was a religious Zia-ul-Haq regime
in Pakistan).
What they
did, they brought all these criminals to Pakistan which is bordering with
Afghanistan for almost 1000 miles. So what they did, the CIA started
training them and sending them to kill the Afghans, destroy the Afghan
revolution.
So, then
naturally, “naturally”, it is a very natural thing, the Soviet Union had to…
because there was a friendship treaty with Afghanistan.
The Soviet
Union and Afghanistan signed the friendship treaty in September 1978.
So
according to that treaty the Afghan Government was able to ask the Soviet
Union, in case they were in trouble, to ask for the Soviet Union to help and
the Soviet Union provided that help.
So, the
point is that the United States taught these criminals, dropped them there
to fight not only the Afghan Communists, but then they thought they will
make it the Soviet Union but now… And that is how all that process started
through Pakistan. Pakistan was a reactionary regime of military.
So, Afghanistan became a sandwich between
two: Shia and Sunni Muslim fundamentalists.
Reminder
Robles: Can
you give us a few more details? Can you compare what the United States is
doing now and what the Soviet Union was doing when they were in there, in
Afghanistan? Because now some people are trying to say: “Oh, well!! The
Soviet Union “INVADED” Afghanistan… The Soviet Union…
Gulzad: I
fight it every day. I fought it even at that time when Ronald Reagan was in
power. Vladimir Ponzner will be the witness on that.
We had a
Progressive Afghan Student Organization and I was the head of it.
My point
is that you cannot compare the Soviet Union because Afghanistan People’s
Democratic Party had the same ideology as the Communist Party of the Soviet
Union.
So, the
idea was that Afghanistan PDPA was giving land, Afghanistan was a very poor
country, an almost feudal society, so we were giving land to the poor. What
person is going to rise against you if you give them a piece of land? If you
teach their daughter and son?
They (The
U.S.S.R.) built schools, they built everything that is in Afghanistan today,
I am telling you as an Afghan! Every road, highway, dam, factory, airport
that you can see, the infrastructure of Afghanistan is made in the USSR.
Robles: Few
people know that.
Gulzad: Including
Bagram that today the American Imperialists are sitting there. It is the
Soviet Union that built everything.
Thousands
of Afghan students, including my brother, became educated in the Soviet
Union. I mean “what the hell?” people are going to… It was Not the people!
Do you
know that there was a recent interview on BBC and CNN. They went to Kandahar
and to Ghazni, two cities in Afghanistan. They were asking people… An Afghan
farmer he spit on the American journalist!
He said:
“The Soviet Union brought a lot of things to this country, peace, but you
brought war.”
Certainly!
And they showed it on TV, I saw it on BBC and Aljazeera.
Robles: So,
what is the real situation in Afghanistan right now, after almost 13 years
of US occupation?
Gulzad: My
point is this: that if you want to stop this war, you should go to Pakistan.
Pakistan is a very poor country. Pakistan is controlling the Taliban, the Al
Qaeda, everybody.
If United
States wants to stop this war, then United States could squeeze Pakistan
economically and in many ways! Pakistan is a joke!
So, my
point is that the United States wants to prolong this war because they want
to stay in Afghanistan.
The United
States has total control economically and militarily over Pakistan. End of part 1 'I salute the former Soviet Union' - Part Two
The former Soviet Union built everything in Afghanistan including the bases which the US is now occupying, the United States is supporting Radical Islamic groups, including Chechen terrorists, to destabilize countries they are targetting. Syria is the most secular progressive country in the Muslim World yet i being attacked by the West and all of the US actions are back-firing on them, they believe that quick victory is the proper route. They are worng. All of theses issues were discussed in an interview with Dr. Zalmay Gulzad, an Afghan native who teaches Political Science at Harold Washington College in Chicago.
Gulzad: The
point is that what the United States is doing and NATO is doing: they want
to prolong this war with the collaboration of the Pakistani army. The very
government in Pakistan is a joke, is silly, is nothing. The decisions are
made by the military, the military is with the United States.
Robles: What
are the reasons, I mean, why does the US want to be in Afghanistan and in
your opinion, resources or what?
Gulzad: It
is very important geopolitically and I will tell you why. Afghanistan is now
very poor and I salute the Soviet people because the Soviet Union (the
former Soviet Union) because Afghanistan has so many resources and now they
have revealed how many resources they have. The Soviet Union did not take
any of it. They did not take advantage of it, because we have petroleum, we
have copper, we have so many things now.
They gave
the biggest copper mine to Chinese now, and in the Central Afghanistan they
have the steel and all that kind of stuff.
So anyway,
the reason that United States wants to prolong this war and stay there is
because; first of all we have a 150 mile border with China. Then we are very
close to Russia, if you pass Tadzhikistan, it’s Russia, and then we have
Iran, then we have Persian Gulf, so Afghanistan is a very important.
Now I’ll
tell you that these bases that United States is using today which were made
by the Soviet Union. One in the north of Afghanistan is American base now,
and Shindand, the Soviet Union built it, it is bordering with Iran and
Pakistan, then Kandahar, then you have Bagram, which is north of Kabul, now
they are building a base almost everywhere including Badakhshan. Badakhshan
is not too far from Tadzhikistan and the Chinese borders.
And also
the United States is supporting the Uyghur Muslim group and Tadjiks in
Xinjiang Province, which is bordering Afghanistan. They are making trouble
for the Chinese Muslims. And also United States is supporting the Chechen
group in Russia.
Robles: Which
group did you say in Russia?
Gulzad: In
Russia, the Chechen group.
Robles: Sure.
Gulzad: And
also in China they are supporting Uyghur and Tadjiks.
Robles: I
think they would support any group that will destabilize or weaken any
country that they want to attack, I think.
Gulzad: Absolutely.
My point is that when they are saying that the Cold War is over, they were
anti-communists. What the hell? I mean today Russia is not a Communist
country.
Robles: No,
we are not.
Gulzad: But
the point is that United States have a phobia and they want to be the
imperialist power. What they are doing with the world today: my God!!
I always
discuss with my colleagues here that… Okay, how many countries did the
Soviet Union invade? How many countries has the United States invaded in our
lifetime? How many wars? Just recently: Panama, Nicaragua, Afghanistan,
Iraq, for no reason, for no reason.
Robles: Iraq,
Iran, the list goes on and on.
Gulzad: In
Syria, they want to know, why doesn’t the United States want to… (if they
are such champions of human rights and democracy) …why don’t they say
anything about Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Qatar, Bahrain, all these kingdoms?
Robles: Sure.
Gulzad: Why
Syria? Syria is more secular, more progressive country.
Robles: I
don’t understand… Okay Syria; they were just attacked, about 50 people, this
was yesterday, 53 people are said to have been dead by an Al-Qaeda group.
Israel is
bombing Syria, and the United States, so we have Israel, Al-Qaeda and the
United States working together (Working together right?) to destroy Syria.
Doesn’t that seem strange?
Gulzad: Absolutely.
And how it’s backfiring!! Let me tell you something. Just a few months ago I
did an interview on American television here, on the so-called Arab Spring.
So what’s happened? I told them, the United States is not supporting the
progressive group; intellectuals. They don’t have to be left group but just
regular progressive secular groups.
What they
did: they supported the most radical Islamist group, the problem was
Mubarak, because they were sick and tired of Mubarak. They wanted to find a
new puppet. What happened is it backfired! Guess what? Who won? The Islamic
fundamentalists.
In Libya
they did the same thing because they are too stupid here because they think
that quick victory will bring them happiness and glory. So, what they did in
Libya. they did the same thing. Guess who took over? Islamic
fundamentalists.
This is
what happened in Tunisia: Islamic fundamentalists.
Right now,
yesterday, the Congress of the United States decided to give millions of
dollars to the radicals of Syria. They are not giving it to intellectuals,
to secular groups, they claim that they are fighting for democracy and
secular regimes. But they are giving it to them because they want to get
over, through this in a blink.
A lot of
this is backfiring, 3-4 countries backfired on them. And then after Syria,
mark my words for it, it is Iran. It’s not that I love Iran, Iran regime is
a fascist regime, but my point is that the United States will go there
because if you look from Morocco to Iran, to Afghanistan, to India and
everything, guess what? All of them are pro-American except Iran and Syria.
These two places are not puppets.
And the
expansion of NATO against who? Now the Warsaw pact is not there! Against
who? Why do you expand this? You took Saakashvili from Chicago. Do you know
Saakashvili is from Chicago, he was the lawyer here, they picked him up and
made him the president of Georgia, and now they find another puppet. Do you
know that Karzai’s brother had a restaurant in Chicago? They picked him up
from Chicago and gave him the same thing.
Robles: Bashar
Assad was a dentist in London. I couldn’t understand why they went against
him.
Gulzad: It
is amazing, isn’t it? If you look at Lithuania, so many places, look at
Ukraine, the guy who was the former president of Ukraine, his wife was from
the United States, from Chicago.
Robles: I’ve
talked to many people and it seems like most of the world is being
controlled by some part of Chicago for some reason.
Gulzad: Chicago
is the mafia city. It is just amazing.
Robles: Now
listen, here is a hypothetical that I don’t think anyone has ever talked
about, but… You say the plan is backfiring. We see, everybody sees: ok, they
are funding these terrorists, they are promoting terrorism actually. They
are creating more terrorists. They are financing
radical-Islamic-violent-people, right?
Gulzad: Absolutely.
Robles: Is
it possible that that is, what they want?
Gulzad: Well,
they want to destabilize their enemy, the only way you can weaken a country
and society is with a civil war, and how you do it? Like for example in
China, you promote Tibet, you promote the idea of Islamist Uyghur and
Tadjiks, it’s one problem.
You go to
Russia, make Russia very busy with the terrorists through Georgia, which
Sakashvili was helping. From Georgia you head then to Dagestan, and, you
know, Chechen area and you could create problems for Russia. That is the
only way, see?
And then
you make excuses that I am staying in Afghanistan because the Taliban are
still in power and al-Qaeda is still alive.
Robles: That
is what I am talking about. And then they can continue the endless War on
Terror because they keep creating more and more terrorists themselves.
Gulzad: You
know there is key reason, the weak countries in the world, what they do;
they are diverting attention from the inside misery of the people, from
internal forces because inside it is empty and miserable and worse economy,
so what they do they tell the people that outside is going to…
That’s the
history of United States, think about it. Castro is going to attack Florida.
The Soviet Union is going to come and get us! The Russians are coming!!
Okay? Then Saddam Hussein is going to come and invade the United States.
Then they created this man, this stupid man with a beard called Osama, Bin
Laden, okay?
So, what
they did, they made Americans wave the flag! “We are Americans!” And the
became very patriotic and all this. So, they continue finding these external
unbelievable forces.
And their
motive is this: as I said before and just recently I gave another interview,
that what they want to do is they want to stay in Afghanistan. They want to
stay in Iraq. Permanently, they will stay in Afghanistan because of Russia,
because of China, because of the BRICs, China, India, and Russia, in this
part of the world.
Plus they
don’t like Iran, so they want to destabilize Iran through Afghanistan. These
are all excuses.
Where are
these terrorists? If you want to finish this thing, tomorrow you tell
Pakistan that: “You will not get a penny”, Pakistan is a very poor country,
and it is all over, give me these terrorist groups, one by one”.
Robles: Listen
Doctor Gulzad, we have to finish. I really loved speaking with you. Can I
call you again?
Gulzad: Call
me any time.
Robles: Thank
you very much sir!
Gulzad: You’re
welcome, alright!
You were
listening to an interview with Dr. Zalmay Gulzad, a Professor at Harold
Washington College in Chicago. Thanks for listening, and as always I wish
you the best.
|