Arctic
Militarization of the Arctic: ‘We have to rethink how war is fought’ Agneta Norberg
30
January, 11:02
As the
Arctic ice continues to melt and resources slowly begin to be available the
West has decided to begin the militarization of the Arctic zone in a bid to
gain control over the precious resources. In an interview with the Voice of
Russia Agenta Norberg, Vice Chair of the Swedish Peace Council gives her
views on the issue and also comments on the militarization of Sweden, Norway
and the North and the NATO expansion into "neutral" areas.
Robles: I
was wondering if you could tell me a little bit about NATO, in the Arctic,
in particular, can you tell our listeners about the radar installations and
satellite communications equipment they have set up in Norway and in
Scandinavia?
Norberg: Well, I’m not a technician but I can tell you that recently it was
published: a book the Satellite War by Bård Wormdal – a journalist at
Norwegian radio. And it was a very important book, it was published in 2011.
I invited
him to Stockholm in October when we had a day about the Arctic and the
situation in the Arctic. And what he says is rather? You have to change your
whole idea of how war is conducted. War is conducted via satellite and via
radar installations.
And for
instance, to make it clear, to understand what we should understand is: that
the war on Libya, the former year, was conducted via satellite from
Svalbard. This is very dangerous because, this island, the Svalbard Islands
are a peace area undersigned by 14 different nations but Norway has allowed
the United States of America to deploy radar installations, and in
connection with the satellite they are conducting war. This is a quite new
understanding of how war is conducted.
Robles: NATO
and the US, they claim that their missiles, that are now surrounding Russia
and their radar installations all over the world, that these are somehow a
defensive shield.
Norberg: You have to differ between all these: the national missile defense,
they call it. The Vardo radar close to the Russian border is one
installation, and there are also those in Poland and in Turkey, and they
will also be deployed in Romania it is a missiles shield. It is one thing.
The other
thing are all the other radars and satellites which are informing the pilots
and the war planes how to bomb and where to bomb. I have a globe here in
front of me and it is almost all covered by US radar installations for
different purposes. So, you have this national missile shield, which they
claim is for defense, and it is an offensive weapon. It can be used as
defensive but it can as well be used as an offensive weapon. And one of
those radars are installed just outside the Russian border in Vardo.
I’ve been
rather surprised when I’ve met Russian scientists and visitors in Stockholm,
last year in October, I arranged a seminar as I mentioned about the Arctic,
and the Russian representative, he didn’t agree with me that this was a
dangerous situation. The only one who agreed with me was Bård Wormdal, the
journalist who had written the book Satellite War.
There
seems to be lack of understanding about the installations surrounding the
Russian border, that is my opinion. And I think it is rather dangerous.
Robles: Why
did the Russian expert disagree with you?
Norberg: Because he said that the Vardo radar is not dangerous, and I
disagreed with him. And also Bård Wormdal disagreed with him.
This Vardo
radar, a few kilometers outside Russian border, is rather dangerous because
it is in the missile defense system, so called missile defense system. So, I
think he was not aware of this. We disagreed rather strong on this matter
and that’s why I’m very happy that you called me so I can tell this.
Robles: There
hasn’t been much news about that. Now, as far as NATO and the Arctic in the
north and Scandinavia and Canada, can you give us some details about NATO’s
plans and their current activities, especially in the Arctic, as it is
opening up, and resources are becoming available that were not available
before?
Norberg: Then I think I will drift back to Sweden because during the last
years, starting with 2007, there’ve been huge war maneuvers on the Swedish
and Norwegian soil, with all NATO, and specifically the American State
participating in huge maneuvers in the north.
They were
called for instance: Nordic Air Meet in 2007 where a lot of countries took
part, and then in 2009, it was Loyal Arrow: history’s largest air maneuver
in the northern part of Sweden and Norway, and also Finland was the area.
And then it continued with the Cold Response №1, a winter maneuver in the
northern part of Sweden and northern Norway. And it continued in March 2012
with the Cold Response №2 with 16,500 soldiers from 15 different countries.
And then after this you had last autumn a huge maneuver in the north called
Nordic Air Meet №2.
So, there
are ongoing military war games and some Russian military has protested,
specifically against Cold Response №2.
Nobody in
Sweden would have known about this unless 5 Norwegian personnel crashed into
Kebnekaise, a mountain in the northern Sweden, we would never have known
about these 16,500 troop military maneuver.
So, it is
ongoing, not on daily basis, but certainly every year it is about two huge
maneuvers in the north, and even in the south, in the Baltic. And this
should be highlighted I think.
Robles: Now…
Sweden as I understand is a neutral country, one point: how does Sweden
officially explain that they allowed these installations? And do you think
all these maneuvers are designed to intimidate Russia or to try to exercise
sovereignty on the Arctic? And in that regard, what moves have they made to
try to establish their own sovereignty over Arctic areas that were in
dispute?
Norberg: Well, when we drift to Arctic I think there are two things going on
here. When they are interviewed, those who are in charge of these maneuvers,
they always answer that this is for the Arctic. They openly express this.
These maneuvers are for the Arctic and the resources which will be available
when the ice is melting. Agneta Norberg is Vice Chair of the Swedish Peace Council, Member of Steering Committee in International Peace Bureau (IPB) and on the board of directors Global Network Against Weapons and Nuclear Power in Space.
|