"In order to fully understand, or even to simply
begin to attain a limited understanding of, the events that are taking place
in the world today, one must dig back to the days before the assassination
of John Fitzgerald Kennedy, although that may not be far enough, especially
when one begins to uncover the ties between the CIA and the Bush family and
further to MOSSAD.To
understand that relationship one must dig even further back to the
cooperation between Prescott Bush and the Nazis and yet one may find that
even that is not enough. Eventually through continual digging going back
through the pages of history we might end up with the genocide of the
indigenous people of North and South America, the Catholic Church's Doctrine
of Discovery, which facilitated the genocide of up to 500 million indigenous
people in the Americas, and even then we would just be starting to
understand the big picture because as the saying goes all roads lead to Rome
and in this case all roads lead to the Jews, Zionists and the Rothschild
family to hide Rome. 911 was carried out by members what is now called the Deep State, in
particular the CIA, MOSSAD, Asteroids, DARPA, JSOC, the Secret Service,
Neo-Con Ideologues and the "Elites" in order to advance the multi-pronged
goals of Project Israel, Global US Hegemony, NATO expansion, transfer of
ownership of the US and the hiding of the largest robbery in the history of
the world from the Pentagon and of US gold stored under the WTC." - John Robles
Zionist Motive Behind 9/11
BEST ANALYSIS
Realization of the goals as formulated in the policy paper
Clean Break, as well as the realization of the goals of the
Project of the New American Century. It all comes down to the
strengthening of the American global supremacy by creating an excuse for
obtaining a larger military presence in the Middle East where some 60
percent of the global oil reserves are located (PNAC-goal), as well as
improvement of the geostrategic position of Israel by eliminating its most
important enemies (Iraq, Iran, Syria –> Clean Break-goal).
The link with oil
explains why people like Dick Cheney were on-board, somebody who made his
career in the oil business. For the rest it would be a mistake to perceive a
too-big-a-difference between the American and Jewish/Israeli interests,
since the Jews constitute without competition the dominant class in the US,
who hold all the levers to power: the visual and written media,
the FED,
Wallstreet, think tanks (AEI for instance), Hollywood, plus a large amount
of organizations that cement the power of the Jews (AIPAC
and ADL as important examples).
The circumstance that de facto American
politics (Dems plus Reps) is controlled by the Jews was until recently only
said aloud by the extreme Right, now this insight starts to be realized by
the Left as well, mainly because of the work of
Mearsheimer and Walt (in the Netherlands brought under the attention by
the leftwing broadcasting organization VPRO, see the English spoken
‘Tegenlicht’ documentary ‘The
Israel Lobby‘). That the
Iraq-war
was initiated by the (Jewish dominated)
Neocon-movement, is so obvious that almost nobody denies that anymore.
How 9/11 was done
According to Bollyn 9/11 was concipated in a small network of conspirators
in New York, Washington, Tel Aviv and Jerusalem. The central figures in that
conspiracy were Silverstein, Olmert, Netanyahu, Atzmon, Dov Zakheim (my
addition, via Dick Eastman) and many others and was carried out by the
Mossad (responsible for the technical realization of the 9/11 operation,
consisting in software-manipulation and placing of explosives in the 9/11
target buildings). For a better understanding of all the links between
people and organizations of the 9/11 Israeli crime network in the story that
follows right click on the diagram below and open it in a different tab of
your browser. Again, the diagram is based on the content of
this story by Christopher Bollyn.
I will give a short summary of what Bollyn says about 9/11 and its
perpetrators in that article, mixed with some speculations of my own and
observations of others. The story by Bollyn is a very interesting read (some
40 page’s if printed out) The 9/11-plan originated in a handful of Israeli
brains: Isser Harel with his fixation on the WTC-towers, Dov Zakheim with
his knowledge of remote control and the motive to stop the Pentagon-audit
regarding the missing 2 trillion dollar (this idea I have from Dick Eastman,
see further below), and Netanyahu and Olmert with their
Clean-Break-fixation. Directly after 9/11 it was the dual passport holder
Michael Chertoff, who from his position as Asst. Attorney General within the
ministry of Justice could quietly get rid of several suspects of 9/11 and
get them out of the country without prosecution. More specifically the
Israelis that got arrested near the Holland Tunnel. The early indications of
Israeli involvement followed from the story of the 5 dancing Israelis as
well as the
Odigo warning messages, addressed at the Jewish WTC-employees.
04-16-2023
Finally: Investigation File Showing CIA Involvement in 911
911 BOOM!!! JAR2 REDEEMED!!! "911 was a MOSSAD CIA False
Flag used to protect the Zionist entity from any future
military threat and expand the parasitic hegemony of the
US and the illegitimate Tel Aviv regime throughout the
world by the Zionist inspired War on Terror." (Buildings
3, 4, 5, and 6?) - A Fearless Black Hats Film
WikiLeaks
Served the 911 Op by Never Publishing Anything About 911 (The only thing
related to 911 they did publish were the cell phone files which helped
the fake cell phone story)
Because Project gnome was unique in purpose, and was done for the purpose of trapping a nuclear explosion underground to harvest the heat from it for generation of electricity, AND because Project Gnome was a detonation of a known size that actually hit it's calculated potential, AND because the cavern created by project Gnome was .
9-11/PNAC and Full Spectrum Dominance (In Full Below )
In order to fully understand, or even to simply begin to attain a limited understanding of, the events that are taking place in the world today, one must dig back to the days before the assassination of John Fitzgerald Kennedy, although that may not be far enough, especially when one begins to uncover the ties between the CIA and the Bush family.To understand that relationship one must dig even further back to the cooperation between Prescott Bush and the Nazis and yet one may find that even that is not enough. Eventually through continual digging going back through the pages of history we might end up with the genocide of the indigenous people of North and South America, the Catholic Church's Doctrine of Discovery, which facilitated the genocide of up to 400 million indigenous people in the Americas, and even then we would just be starting to understand the big picture..
Report By Barbara Honeggar MS and hosted and distributed for her and the TESLA Society by JAR2 - TESLA Report ZIPPED
Finally a report that details and explains the events that occurred on 9-11 and methodically and factually tears the entire "official version" to shreds. By taking apart the most clearly egregious and most easily discounted event, the Pentagon attack, the authors of this 300+ page report make it clear to even the most staunch supporter of the "official" fallacy that the "official" version of the events that occurred on 9-11 is a complete cover up and a sham. This reports goes further and names the perpetrators of the events and makes it clear that as I have been saying from the beginning 9-11 was an inside job by ZIonist Nazi ideologues bent on global domination by force. PNAC, the NEOCONS and all of the people we suspected are involved in the plot. Their attempted domination of the world by force has continued since that day and recent events in Ukraine and elswhere are just a continuation. If you want to understand what is really going on in the world and who is behind it you must read this report. It explains even the taking over of the Russian media by Zionists and defines the persecution I have been through. 9-11 was an inside job carried out by the US Black Operations Community including JSOC, DIA and CIA at the top levels under the direction of Dick Cheney. It was carried out with the assistance funding and support of Israel, Saudi Arabia and their intelligence agencies, including MOSSAD and Suadi intelligence led by Bandar Bush. It is time we stopped being afraid and putthese mass-murdering monsters into the eternal rooms with no windows or doors where they belong.
911: Enemies Foreign and Domestic, Israel Carried Out 911 (310 pages)
Pentagon Say $6.5 Trillion Dollars Is Missing, Sparking Fears Of ‘New 9/11’
The Pentagon cannot account for $6.5 trillion dollars according to a new
Department of Defense Inspector General’s
report –
raising alarm bells not just because of the obvious lack of accountability
and oversight, but because the last time the Pentagon ‘lost’ an enormous sum
of money, 9/11 happened. Donald Rumsfeld was due to testify about a missing
$2.3 trillion before Congress on September 13 2001, however the case was put
on hold after the events of September 11.
7. RUBINSTEIN, Itay NADDIS -
Negative DOB (01/17/79), US, visa (#39127358), date of entry
12/23/00, Israeli passport (#39127358) [sic, see visa],
6'0", 165 lbs.
21. SMITH, Travis Wayne NADDIS -
Negative. white male, DOB (11/09/74), FBI No. 530083DBS
(Assault - Domestic Violence) address: 615 S. Hardy, 4210,
Tempe, Arizona
22. ESTRADA, Ramon Hispanic male,
NADDIS - Negative. DOB (07/26/63), arrested 12/82
"processing marijuana for sale," 5/95 "transport/sell
narcotics," 7/95 "transport/sell narcotics, adult giving
minor narcotics, " 8/95 "domestic violence." FBI No. 7643
5FAG, CASID No. CA07401218, WASID No. WA17692473
23. GILOR, Yaniv Zacoravich
NADDIS - Negative. registered owner of a 1997 Chevy van in
San Diego, CA
24. MENDEL, Leviella NADDIS -
Negative. 83 77 Tamar Drive, #37, Columbia, Maryland, DOB 10/29/75, Maryland
driver's license #M-534-514-009-032, 5'7", 150 lbs.
Additional inquiries revealed MENDEL has a new residential
address, 4733 Haskell Ave., #46, Encino, California.
25. SILVER, Danny NADDIS -
Negative. (NFI) The Tampa, Florida District
Office identified the following individuals (#26-942):
26. BENDALAK, Orit: NADDIS
negative, DOB 10-28-78, WF, POB Israel, 5'7", 140 lbs.,
brown hair, brown eyes.
27. BEZALEL ACADEMY OF ARTS AND
DESIGN: NADDIS negative, Jerusalem, 011-972-2-589-3333,
www.bezalel.ac.il.
28. COHEN, Eli: NADDIS negative,
701 S. 21 Ave. #207, Hollywood, FL 33020, DOB 11/04/1977, FL
DL C500-200-77-404-0, State of Israel Ministry of Transport
card number 03379722
29. HARARI, Ilana: NADDIS
negative, W/F, DOB 4-29-79, 9-29-79, 2-9-79, 14 Jerico
Itolon Israel, attends University of Jerusalem, 5'3", 90
lbs., brown hair, blue eyes, tattoo of sun on right foot.
30. KENDEL, Rachel: NADDIS
negative, White/Female, State of Israel Ministry of
Transport card number 7095201 and 034807727, Israeli
passport number 6614254.
3 1, KUZNITZ, Keren: NADDIS -
Negative. 1818 E. Oakland Park Blvd. #98, Fort Lauderdale,
FL 33306, DOB 02/09/1979, 5'5"; FL driver's license:
K253-500-79-549-0, State of Israel Ministry of Transport
card number 7121535 and 035721844.
32. L.N.U, Nadav NADDIS - (NFI)
33. L.N.U., Tom NADDIS -
Negative. White, male. Address: Hollywood/Ft. Lauderdale,
Florida. Reportedly sells artwork to Israeli art students.
34. MARZIANO, Assaf or Asaf
NADDIS negative, DOB 2-4-78, state of Israel Ministry of
Transport # 034086959, passport #552306S, POB Israel, WM,
5'7", 150 lbs,
35. MATATIA, Keren: NADDIS
negative (NFI)
36. OSHRA, Sussie: NADDIS
negative. (NFI)
37. SASSOON, Sarah Minna: NADDIS
negative, 2916 Pierce St., 94, Hollywood, FL 33020, DOB
11/8/1978, FL DL# S250-793-79-908-0.
38. SELLA, Livnet: NADDIS
negative, DOB 12/24/1978, State of Israel Ministry of
Transport number 7023400 and 036208023, International
Student Idenitity card number S972-204-776-601.
39. SERFATY, Hanan, aka Hanane
SARFATI: NADDIS negative, 4220 Sheridan St., #303,
Hollywood, FL 33.021, and 701 S. 21 Ave., Hollywood, FL, DOB
06/03/1977, 6', FL DL S613-320-77-203-0, registered owner of
red mini-van FL tag # U71 DLD, phone number (954) 478-1006,
cellular phone number (954) 478-0961.
40, SIMON, Michael: NADDIS
negative, w/m, 11-23-78, Aliebenliezel 82, Jerusalem,
telephone number 97226768256, Israeli passport no. 8660008,
POB Jerusalem, 6'1",180 lbs.,black hair, brown eyes.
41. VAKSHI, Inbal: NADDIS
negative aka Bella POLLCSON, State of Israel Ministry of
Transport License number 7098663 and 036444842,
International Student Identity Card number S972-204-775-487,
DOB 02/03/1979.
44. KEDEM, Guy. NADDIS -Negative.
This female left a business card stating EAG-Guy Kedem,
European Art Group, Oil Paintings; phone number (720)
581-7076; Fax number (303) 336-7006. The (720) number is
unlisted and the (303) number is a fax number for Heritage
Creek Apartments, 650 South Dahlia Circle, Denver, Colorado.
(NFI) The following individuals were
identified by the Ft. Meyers, Florida Resident Office
(#45-48):
45. MEIRAV, Zwaig, NADDIS -
Negative. w/f, thin build, short long dark hair, DOB:
2/9/76, US VISA control # 20003205620012, Israeli passport
97831088
46. MACHBUBI, Hilda, NADDIS -
Negative. w/f DOB: 5/4/79, US VISA control # 2000397210011,
Israeli passport # 6530284, FL ID #M211-320-79-664-0
The
following individuals were identified by the Montgomery,
Alabama District Office:
55. VALANSI, Marcelo,
NADDIS - Negative. dob 11/24/77, Argentina passport
#26316660, 901 S.E. 1st Ave., #2, Gainesville, FL., 617 E.
University Ave., Gainesville, FL., 1436 Washington Ave.,
Miami, FL., registered owner of 1984 GMC Custom Van, Florida
tag T11YZX., Argentina DNI26316660 card 4190961, speaks
English and Spanish, Tel # (352)378-1485 (Identified in
Paragraph 6)
56. VALANSI, Roberto, NADDIS -
Negative. father of Marcelo VALANSI. Salguero 2468,
Apartment 15, Buenos Aires (NFI) (Identified in Paragraph
10)
57. VALANSI, Graziela, NADDIS -
Negative. mother of Marcelo VALANSI, Salguero 2468,
Apartment 15, Buenos Aires (NFI) (Identified in Paragraph
10)
58. SAGES, Ester, NADDIS -
Negative. dob 9/30/77, Israeli passport 96470399, Attornet
161, New York City, NY., Hotel Carlton, New York City, NY
father of Ester SAGES, (NFI) (Identified in Paragraph 9)
Identified in Paragraph 6)
59. SAGES, Elyahu NADDIS -
Negative. (deceased),
60. SAGES, Marjalit, NADDIS -
Negative. Mother of Ester SAGES (NFI) (Identified in
Paragraph 8)
61. DARDIC, Vanina Erika, NADDIS
- Negative. dob 3/5/78, Argentina passport #10581811, 901
S.E. 1st Ave., Gainesville, FL. . Argentina DN126473227 card
#J8557, speaks English, Hebrew, and Spanish, girlfriend of
VALANSI, citizen of Argentina and Israel (Identified in
Paragraph 4)
62. DARDIC, Mario, NADDIS
Negative. father of Vanina DARDIC (NFI) (Identified in
Paragraph 9)
63. COHEN, Judith (maiden name)
NADDIS - Negative. mother of Vanina DARDIC (NFI) (Identified
in Paragraph 9)
64. GAVISH, Yael NADDIS -
Negative. W/F Brown hair, Brown eyes, DOB: Oct 03, 1978.
Citz: Israel Passport Number: 5013766 issued 12-03-92,
expires 3-12-2002 US Visa number 20001818940002 Class
B-1/B-2 issued July 05, 2000 Expires June 28, 2010.
65. BALHAMS, Meirav NADDIS -
Negative. W/F Brown hair, Brown eyes, 5'03" DOB: 10-03-78
Citz: Israel. New York ED Card 4 140-614-039. Address: 354
Paterson Plank Road #1, Jersey City, NJ 07650
The
following individuals were identified by the Orlando D.O. on
May 3, 2001:
66. SEGALOVITZ, Peer -
NADDIS Negative, White, male, Nationality: Israeli, DOB:
03-16-1974, POB Israel, Address: 8187 N. University Drive
Apt. 4129, Tamarac, FL, entered the U.S. on B-2 class visa
on January 17, 2001. Former
officer in Israeli Special Forces 605 Battalion. Israeli
Military ED # 5087989.
Encountered May 3, 2001 at the Orlando D.O. Occupation:
Israeli Art Vendor/Student. (Identified in Paragraph 96)
67. SEGALOVITZ, Dror - NADDIS -
Negative. White, Male, Brother of Peer Segalovitz. ADD:
Address 8187 N. University Drive, Apt. Nationality: Israel.
Identified in Paragraph 98)
69. SAGIV, Akyuz Shmuel - NADDIS:
Negative. White, Male, Israeli Passport # 8710426; DOB:
09-27-1976; POB: Maaloot, Israel; Entered US In New York;
PN: 954712-2126. Associate of Peer Segalovitz and Dror
Segalovitz. (Identified in paragraph #99).
The
following were identified at the Volk Field ANG Base, Camp
Douglas, Wisconsin:
70. WATERMANN, Tsvi NADDIS
- Negative, AKA: Watermann, Zvi; white, male, DOB: June 7,
1979; Address: Pri Megadim 36 Mevaseret Zion, Isreal;
Israeli Passport # 5728101 expiration date July 20, 2002;
U.S. visa class B1/B2 expiration date March 20, 2011;
Israeli Ministry of Transport driver's license, number
7046942.
71. KANTOR, Gal Kal NADDIS -
Negative. white, male, DOB: Sep 08, 1975, Address: Kibbuts
Eilon NO Western Galilee, Israel 22845; Israeli Passport
8261507 expiration date of Oct 20, 2004; U.S. B1/B2 visa,
control number 19993358160012, expiration date of Nov 30,
2009. The following were identifed at
Tinker AFB, Oklahoma:
72. OHANA, Yaron NADDIS -
Negative. DOB: 02-04-78; POB: Haifa, Israel; Passport
Number: 8421721 U.S. Visa Number:42252049.
73. KALFON, Ronen NADDIS -
Negative. DOB: 04-13-76; POB: Haifa, Israel Passport Number
:8168262; U.S. Visa Number: 3 5966019.
74. COHEN, Zeev NADDIS -
Negative. DOB: 03-26-78; POB: Haifa, Israel, Passport
Number: 5524033: U.S. Visa Number: 33331965.
75. TOPAZ, Naor NADDIS - Negative
DOB: 06-08-77; POB: Haif, Israel Passport Number: 8081705;
U.S. Visa Number: 33306515.
The
following were identified by the Euless, TX Police
Department on January 2nd, 2001, (refer to page 10):
77. YANAY, Betzalel, NADDIS -
Negative. W/M, DOB 09/04/1978
78. BITON, MoriN Miryam, NADDIS -
Negative. W/F; DOB 07/14/1980
79. SASSON, Dana, NADDIS -
Negative. W/F, DOB 08/10/1980
80. TOUYZ, Keren, NADDIS -
Negative. W/F, DOB 08/20/1978
81. TZOR, Noam, NADDIS -
Negative. previous owner of 1GAHG39K5SF112662, a 1995
Chev/Spt owned by Gilad LIFSHITZ of 7535 N. Beltline Rd, APt
316, Irving, Texas 75062.
82. ROTEM, Sharon, NADDIS -
Negative. described as a white male, DOB 03 -12-77, Israeli
passport number 7948317, street address: 6023 Moshe Dayan,
Holon, Israel.
83. MAIMON, Maya, NADDIS -
Negative. Nationality: Israel. Israeli passport number as
5467894, US B1/B2 visa, DOB 26Dec1978, Issue Date:
18Oct2000, Expiration Date: 15Oct2010.
84.BADIHI, Nofar, NADDIS -
Negative. Nationality Israel. Israeli passport number
5640993, DOB 21/03/1979 (sic), Place of Birth: Israel, date
of issue:05/12/1993, date of expiry (sic): 04/12/1995; US
Visa B I/B2, issueDate: 05Jul 1996, ExpiryDate: 02JUL2006.
85. MARABOTTO, Marco NADDIS -
Negative. Airline tickets were found reflecting the travel
of Maya MAIMON and Marco MARABOTTO from DFW airport to
Albuquerque, NM via Delta flight 2238 on March 24, 2001.
Each ticket also reflected Delta flight 1944 from Las Vegas
to DFW on April 1, 2001.
86. FERNANDEZS, Marco, NADDIS -
Negative a.k.a. Marco Antonio FERNANDEZ De Castro Marabotto,
DOB 13Apr1977, passport number 99390039611, Issuing State:
Mexico; place of birth: Mexico, date of issue: 16Jul1999,
expiration Date: l6Jul2000.
87. REGEV, Gadi, NADDIS -
Negative described as DOB: 17Dec1975, Nationality: Israel,
passport number 5454338, vis, issuing post: Tel 10334 Sandra
Lynn Dr., Dallas, TX 75228. DOB 05-27-1977, commercial
database shows that ARTZI is the owner of a 1993 Plymouth
Acclaim, a type: B1/B2Texas plate: J75FYB, date registered
08/21/2000, expiration Date: 07/31/2001 89, SUSI, David, NADDIS Negative
DOB 01/09/1975, boyfriend of Maya MAIMON
The
following were identified by I&NS - Dallas:
90. ELDAD, Dahan, NADDIS -
Negative. W/M Israeli, add: Oak IEH Apts. 1913 Estrada
Parkway, #228, Irving, TX. Arrested by I&NS March 26 2001.
(Identified in paragraph 39)
91. AFRICANO-Leon, Elsa Beatriz,
NADDIS - Negative. W/F Nationality: Colombia Add: Oak Hill
Apts. 1913 Estrada Parkway, #228, Irving, TX. Arrested by
I&NS March 26, 2001. (Identified in paragraph 39)
92. LIVNI, Eran, NADDIS -
Negative. W/M Israeli Add: Oak Hill Apts. 1913 Estrada
Parkway, #228, Irving, TX Arrested by I&NS March 26, 2001.
(Identified in paragraph 40)
93. OFEK, Aran, NADDIS -
Negative. W/M Israeli, ADD: Oak Hill Apts. 1913 Estrada
Parkway, #259, Irving, TX., father is 2-star general in
Israeli Army. Arrested by I&NS March 26, 200 1. (Identified
in paragraph 40)
94, GAL, Michal, NADDIS -
Negative. W/F, Israeli, DOB 08/10/1979, POB Afula, Israel,
INS A 75-894-941, ADD: Oak Hill Apts. 1913 Estrada Parkway,
4259, Irving, TX, Alt add.: 22 Palisade Terrace, Edgewater,
NJ 01020 Tel: (201)224-0797 Arrested by I&NS March 26, 2001.
(Identified in paragraph 40)
95. GAVRIEL, Noam, NADDIS -
Negative. Nationality: Israel (Identified in paragraph 40)
96. KRITZMAN, Netta, NADDIS -
Negative. Nationality: US Citizen (Identified in paragraph
40)
102. MOSHE, Eran, NADDIS -
Negative. Israeli, I&NS A 75-894-459, averted by I&N on
03/26/2001, occup. Israeli art student (Identified in
paragrph 44))
103. VAINSHTEIN, Julia, NADDIS -
Negative. W/F Israeli, DOB 11/12/1978, POB: Russia, arrived
DFW on 03/27/2001, Assoc: Michael CALMANOVIC (Identified in
paragraph 46))
104. BORENSTEIN, Dilka, NADDIS -
Negative. Israeli, DOB 03/15/1979, POB::Israel, former Israeli Military Intelligence Officer, Assoc:
Michael CALMANOVIC (Identified in paragraph 46))
105. NAVAR, Ofir, NADDIS -
Negative. Israeli, DOB 09/02/1979, POB::Israel, former Israeli Military Demolition/Explosive
ordnance specialist
((Identified inparagraph 46))
106. CALMANOVIC, Michael, NADDIS
- Negative. W/M, Israeli, DOB 09/06/1-975, POB: Israel,
registered owner of TX: L44-CVD, add: 3575 N. Beltline Rd.,
Apt. 316, Irving, TX., alt. add: 312 Rochelle Rd., Irving,
TX, alt. add: 1103 Hidden Ridge #3018, Irving, TX alt. Add:
1913 Estrada Parkway, Irving, TX 75061, alt. add: 11012
Ventura Blvd., Studio City, CA 91604 Tel: (214)882-5196,
alt, add: 319 S. 177 Place, 4201, Seattle, WA 98148 Tel:
(206) 244-7705, Tel: (214) 882-5196 / (214) 837-3574 /
(469)446-1248 (214) 837-5996 (214) 876-1235 (217) 837-20566
former
Israeli electronic intercept officer.. Arrested by I&NS on April 4th, 2001, Posted $50K bond,
(Identified in paragraph 46))
107. SIMON, Itay, NADDIS -
Negative. W/M, Israeli, DOB 02/27/1978, POB:: Israel, former Israeli militaryy,
add: 1103 Hidden Ridge #3018, Irving, TX, alt add:
California Associate of Michael Calmanovic. Arrested by I&NS
April 4, 2001 for violation of status, posted $50,000 bond.
(Identified in paragraph 50))
113. ENGEL, Yoni, NADDIS -
Negative. W/K DOB 09/14/1979, POB::Israeli Citizen, Israel, former company commader in Israeli
military,, arrived DFW on
03/28/2001, arrested by I&NS, St. Louis, MO on April 4th,
2001 (Identified in paragraph 51))
114. DAGAI, Yotam, NADDIS -
Negative. DOB 04/06/1978, POB: Israeli Citizen, Israel,
arrested by I&NS, St. Louis, MO on April 4th, 2001, arrived
DFW on 03/28/2001. (Identified in paragraph 51))
115. ALROEI, Or, W/M DOB
08/08/1978, POB: Israeli Citizen, Israel, visited DEA St.
Louis on 04/04/2001, Had Tel: (214) 882-5196 in his
possession, Associate of Michael CALMANOVIC & Gil LNU.
(Identified in paragraph 51))
116. RABINOVITZ, Eli, NADDIS -
Negative. W/M, DOB 03/27/1979,, U.S.
passporttE3701329518,
5'6", Aviv, issue Date: 05Nov1998, expiration Date:
04Nov20088
88. ARTZI, Eyal, NADDIS -
Negative Texas DL 19554509, and an expiration date of
06-27-07. address: 175 lbs., brown hair (Identified in
paragraph 51))
117. ADESA Golden Gate, NADDIS -
Negative. add: 6700 Stevenson Blvd., Fremont, CA, registered
owner of CA: 3LVAO1P (Identified in paragraph 51))
118. SADAN, Ben, NADDIS -
Negative, W/M Israeli, approx. 24 yoa, Tel: (214) 562-1110,
driver of Israeli art students encountered April 4, 2001 in
St. Louis, MO..
119. BEN DOR, Tomer, NADDIS -
Negative. W/M Israeli,'DOB 08/24/1975, occup:: Computer software engineer, employer: NICE, former Israeli
military officer for patriot missile defensee (Identified in paragraph 55))
120. GLIKMAN, Marina, NADDIS -
Negative. W/F Nationality: Israel, DOB 12/15/1972
(Identified in paragraph 53))
121. AKIVA, Ronen, associate of
Marina GLIKMAN, occup::computer program employer: RETALIX, former Israeli military
officerr (Identified in
paragraph 55))
122. RETALIX, USA, NADDIS -
Negative. add: 8081 Royal Ridge Parkway, Irving, TX,
formerly known as Point of Sale, Limited. (Identified in
paragraph 55)..
123. DOR, Hillel, NADDIS -
Negative. W/M Israeli, DOB 04/06/1971. Associate of Marina
GLIKMAN (Identified in paragraph 55))
124. MILLER, Zeev, NADDIS -
Negative. W/M Israeli, DOB 09/04/1971, occup:
student/software engineer, employer: RETALIX Israel
(Identified in paragraph 55)..
125. SHAKED, Barry, NADDIS -
Negative, CEO of RETALIX (Identified in paragraph 55).
911: The Main Players and the MOSSAD Demolition Team
PTech was a company whose employees had been present in the basement of the
FAA two years prior to 9/11. This enabled PTech like no other to manipulate
the software of the FAA
Bollyn discovered in 2005 that PTech was a hidden Israeli intelligence
operation. This was a key discovery. It was this discovery that helped to
unmask other key figures in the Israeli network
Michael Goff, an Israeli lawyer, was the key person within PTech, when it
was founded in 1994. Later Goff worked for Guardium, an Israeli
software-firm with links to military intelligence services. This is the
crucial connection (PTech –> Goff –> Guardium) that was helpful to uncover
the larger Israeli military network that was behind the events of 9/11.
Through the connection that Goff formed between PTech and Guardium we can
see how a complex network of senior officers of the Israeli military
intelligence service can all be connected with key elements of 9/11. This
connection explains also how manipulated software ended up on sensitive
American government- and military computer networks.
The role that Goff played within PTech consisted of buying software for
PTech and sales of enterprise software developed within PTech. Later Goff
joined Guardium, a company that formed a branch of the research and
development department of the Israeli air force. Guardium is a spin-off of
Log-On Software, founded by major Gil Migdan (Israeli marine) en Joseph
Segev (see diagram).
Another founder and director of Guardium is Amit Yoran, an Israeli who
became manager for computer security of the Pentagon. After 9/11 he was
appointed by GW Bush to cyber security czar for the ministry of Homeland
Security. Yoran was charged with the design of a security architecture for
the Pentagon. Rather significant: Yoran has carried out doctoral research on
the field of Intrusion Detection Technologies. He was therefor perfectly
acquainted with the field of spy software.
The link between Goff and the Israeli army dates probably from before 1994,
when he suddenly abandoned his lawyer practice and started working for
PTech.
In all probability Goff’s relationship with the founders of Guardium was the
channel through which Israeli spy software was delivered to PTech. In other
words: Goff was the link between the Israelis military programmers and the
computer networks of the American army.
At the same time as Goff worked for PTech, did Yoran work for the Pentagon
and designed its computer security. From this position Yoran was ideally
placed to install the software developed by PTech on the critical hardware
of the American army. The links between Goff, PTech, Guardium and Amit Yoran
gives a logical explanation for the way Israeli spy software ended up on
those systems.
Next Bollyn mentions amongst others that the Israeli firm Amdocs is an
example of an Israeli company that is being run by senior officers of the
Mossad.
Bollyn mentions the 27-year old Lieutenant Peer Segalovitz as a demolition
expert, who supposedly has been the leader of the team that placed the
explosives in the WTC-complex.
Another rather crucial connection is the one between Jeremy Kroll, who
occupies a position at the advisory board of Security Growth Partners (SGP),
led by Elad Yoran. SGP is a venture capital company. This Elad fellow is a
brother of Amit Yoran mentioned earlier. Why is this connection crucial?
Because with it a link is being established between Kroll Associates, the
firm responsible for the security of the WTC-complex and the world of
software manipulators via Amit Yoran. See the diagram!
The firm Kroll was hired after the WTC-bomb attacks of 1993 with the goal to
reinstall security. A fatal decision. When one accepts that the
WTC-buildings were blown up, then it becomes clear that the security of the
building complex is high on your suspect list. It was precisely in the
computer room of Kroll in the north tower, where the first plane struck
(precision guided). The managing director of Kroll was Jerome Hauer and he
had this position between 1993 and 9/11. Earlier Hauer was the director of
mayor Giuliani’s Office of Emergency Management (OEM), where he was the
driving force o build a command bunker for OEM in WTC-7. It is obvious that
the explosives with which the WTC-1/2/7 were blown up could never have ended
up in the towers if the security had been part of the conspiracy.
Then there is the relationship between Jules Kroll (the father of Jeremy)
and Silverstein, i.e. between the security firm and the owner of the
WTC-complex. They have known each other from the Citizens Budget Commission
of New York. The wife of Jules Kroll knew Silverstein via the United Jewish
Appeal Federation of New York, the largest fund raiser for the state of
Israel. These are two distinct possibilities of how Kroll and Silverstein
could have known each other.
Then comes the last step: the link between WTC security and the demolition
experts of the Israeli army. The link between them is Maurice Greenberg. As
an aside, this guy Greenberg was in the news last month, when his firm AIG,
the worlds largest insurer, acquired billions from his buddies in the
government, as part of the overall Wallstreet bailout scheme. To make a long
story short, it was through the connections with Kroll and Greenberg that
Mossad-demolition experts got control over the WTC en thus were able to
carry out 9/11. The planes were hijacked by remote control.
Until here the story as told by Bollyn.
Note that no distinction is really made between the ICT proposed here and
the notion of ‘inside job’. America if effectively under Zionist control,
meaning that the American establishment can act only in the interest of
Israel and Zionism.
To be continued.....
The Institute for Advanced Strategic and Political Studies Jerusalem,
Washington
The Study Group on a New Israeli Strategy Toward 2000 - Clean Break
Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm: Zionism and Israel First
Following is a report prepared by The Institute for Advanced Strategic and
Political Studies’ "Study Group on a New Israeli Strategy Toward 2000." The
main substantive ideas in this paper emerge from a discussion in which
prominent opinion makers, including Richard Perle, James Colbert, Charles
Fairbanks, Jr., Douglas Feith, Robert Loewenberg, David Wurmser, and Meyrav
Wurmser participated. The report, entitled "A Clean Break: A New Strategy
for Securing the Realm," is the framework for a series of follow-up reports
on strategy.
Israel has a large problem. Labor Zionism, which for 70 years has dominated
the Zionist movement, has generated a stalled and shackled economy. Efforts
to salvage Israel’s socialist institutions—which include pursuing
supranational over national sovereignty and pursuing a peace process that
embraces the slogan, "New Middle East"—undermine the legitimacy of the
nation and lead Israel into strategic paralysis and the previous
government’s "peace process." That peace process obscured the evidence of
eroding national critical mass— including a palpable sense of national
exhaustion—and forfeited strategic initiative. The loss of national critical
mass was illustrated best by Israel’s efforts to draw in the United States
to sell unpopular policies domestically, to agree to negotiate sovereignty
over its capital, and to respond with resignation to a spate of terror so
intense and tragic that it deterred Israelis from engaging in normal daily
functions, such as commuting to work in buses.
Benjamin (Mileikowski) Netanyahu’s
government comes in with a new set of ideas. While there are those who will
counsel continuity, Israel has the opportunity to make a clean break; it can
forge a peace process and strategy based on an entirely new intellectual
foundation, one that restores strategic initiative and provides the nation
the room to engage every possible energy on rebuilding Zionism, the starting
point of which must be economic reform. To secure the nation’s streets and
borders in the immediate future, Israel can:
Work closely with Turkey and Jordan to contain, destabilize, and
roll-back some of its most dangerous threats. This implies clean break
from the slogan, "comprehensive peace" to a traditional concept of
strategy based on balance of power.
Change the nature of its relations with the Palestinians, including
upholding the
right of hot pursuit
for self defense into all Palestinian areas and nurturing alternatives
to Arafat’s exclusive grip on Palestinian society.
Forge a new basis for relations with the United
States—stressing self-reliance, maturity, strategic cooperation on areas
of mutual concern, and furthering values inherent to the West. This can
only be done if Israel takes serious steps to terminate aid, which
prevents economic reform.
This report is written with key passages of a possible speech marked
TEXT,
that highlight the clean break which the new government has an opportunity
to make. The body of the report is the commentary explaining the purpose and
laying out the strategic context of the passages.
A
New Approach to Peace
Early adoption of a bold, new perspective on peace and security is
imperative for the new prime minister. While the previous government, and
many abroad, may emphasize "land for peace"— which placed Israel in the
position of cultural, economic, political, diplomatic, and military retreat
— the new government can promote Western values and traditions. Such an
approach, which will be well received in the United States, includes "peace
for peace," "peace through strength" and self reliance: the
balance of power.
A new strategy to seize the initiative can be introduced:
TEXT
We have for four
years pursued peace based on a
New Middle East.
We in Israel cannot play innocents abroad in a world that is not
innocent. Peace depends on the character and behavior of our foes. We
live in a dangerous neighborhood, with fragile states and bitter
rivalries. Displaying
moral ambivalence
between the effort to build a Jewish state and the desire to annihilate
it by trading
"land for peace"
will not secure
"peace now."
Our claim to the land —to which we have clung for hope for 2000
years--is legitimate and noble. It is not
within our own power,
no matter how much we concede,
to make peace unilaterally.
Only the unconditional acceptance by Arabs of our rights,
especially
in their territorial dimension,
"peace for peace," is a solid basis for
the future.
Israel’s quest for peace
emerges
from, and does not
replace,
the pursuit of its ideals. The Jewish people’s hunger for human rights —
burned into their identity by a 2000-year old dream to live free in their
own land — informs the concept of peace and reflects
continuity of values with Western and Jewish tradition.
Israel can now embrace negotiations, but as
means, not ends,
to pursue those ideals and demonstrate national steadfastness. It can
challenge police states; enforce compliance of agreements; and insist on
minimal standards of accountability.
Securing the Northern Border
Syria challenges Israel on Lebanese soil. An effective approach, and one
with which American can sympathize, would be if Israel seized the strategic
initiative along its northern borders by engaging Hizballah, Syria, and
Iran, as the principal agents of aggression in Lebanon, including by:
striking
Syria’s drug-money and counterfeiting infrastructure in Lebanon, all of
which focuses on Razi Qanan.
paralleling Syria’s behavior by establishing the precedent that Syrian
territory is not immune to attacks emanating from Lebanon by Israeli
proxy forces.
striking Syrian military targets in Lebanon, and should that prove
insufficient,
striking at select targets in Syria proper.
Israel also can take this opportunity to remind the world of the nature of
the Syrian regime. Syria repeatedly
breaks
its word. It violated numerous agreements with the Turks, and has
betrayed
the United States by continuing to occupy Lebanon in violation of the Taef
agreement in 1989. Instead, Syria staged a sham election, installed a
quisling regime, and forced Lebanon to sign a "Brotherhood Agreement" in
1991, that terminated Lebanese sovereignty. And Syria has begun
colonizing
Lebanon with hundreds of thousands of Syrians, while killing tens of
thousands of its own citizens at a time, as it did in only three days in
1983 in Hama.
Under Syrian tutelage, the Lebanese drug trade, for which local Syrian
military officers receive protection payments, flourishes. Syria’s regime
supports the terrorist groups operationally and financially in Lebanon and
on its soil. Indeed, the
Syrian-controlled Bekaa Valley in Lebanon has become for terror what the
Silicon Valley has become for computers.
The Bekaa Valley has become one of the main distribution sources, if not
production points, of the "supernote" — counterfeit US currency so well done
that it is impossible to detect.
Text
Negotiations with repressive regimes like Syria’s require cautious
realism. One cannot sensibly assume the other side’s good faith. It is
dangerous for Israel to deal naively with a regime murderous of its own
people, openly aggressive toward its neighbors, criminally involved with
international drug traffickers and counterfeiters, and supportive of the
most deadly terrorist organizations.
Given the nature of the regime in Damascus, it is both natural and moral
that Israel abandon the slogan "comprehensive peace" and move to
contain
Syria, drawing attention to its weapons of mass destruction program, and
rejecting "land for peace" deals on the Golan Heights.
Moving to a Traditional Balance of Power Strategy
TEXT
We must distinguish soberly and clearly friend from foe. We must make
sure that our friends across the Middle East never doubt the solidity or
value of our friendship.
Israel can shape its strategic environment, in cooperation with Turkey and
Jordan, by weakening, containing, and even rolling back Syria. This effort
can focus on removing Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq — an important
Israeli strategic objective in its own right — as a means of foiling Syria’s
regional ambitions. Jordan has challenged Syria's regional ambitions
recently by suggesting the restoration of the Hashemites in Iraq. This has
triggered a Jordanian-Syrian rivalry to which Asad has responded by stepping
up efforts to destabilize the Hashemite Kingdom, including using
infiltrations. Syria recently signaled that it and Iran might prefer a weak,
but barely surviving Saddam, if only to undermine and humiliate Jordan in
its efforts to remove Saddam.
But Syria enters this conflict with potential weaknesses: Damascus is too
preoccupied with dealing with the threatened new regional equation to permit
distractions of the Lebanese flank. And Damascus fears that the 'natural
axis' with Israel on one side, central Iraq and Turkey on the other, and
Jordan, in the center would squeeze and detach Syria from the Saudi
Peninsula. For Syria, this could be the prelude to a redrawing of the map of
the Middle East which would threaten Syria's territorial integrity.
Since Iraq's future could affect the strategic balance in the Middle East
profoundly, it would be understandable that Israel has an interest in
supporting the Hashemites in their efforts to redefine Iraq, including such
measures as: visiting Jordan as the first official state visit, even before
a visit to the United States, of the new Netanyahu government; supporting
King Hussein by providing him with some tangible security measures to
protect his regime against Syrian subversion; encouraging — through
influence in the U.S. business community — investment in Jordan to
structurally shift Jordan’s economy away from dependence on Iraq; and
diverting Syria’s attention by using Lebanese opposition elements to
destabilize Syrian control of Lebanon.
Most important, it is understandable that Israel has an interest supporting
diplomatically, militarily and operationally Turkey’s and Jordan’s actions
against Syria, such as securing tribal alliances with Arab tribes that cross
into Syrian territory and are hostile to the Syrian ruling elite.
King Hussein may have ideas for Israel in bringing its Lebanon problem under
control. The predominantly Shia population of southern Lebanon has been tied
for centuries to the Shia leadership in Najf, Iraq rather than Iran. Were
the Hashemites to control Iraq, they could use their influence over Najf to
help Israel wean the south Lebanese Shia away from Hizballah, Iran, and
Syria. Shia retain strong ties to the Hashemites: the Shia venerate foremost
the Prophet’s family, the direct descendants of which — and in whose veins
the blood of the Prophet flows — is King Hussein.
Changing the Nature of Relations with the Palestinians
Israel has a chance to forge a new relationship between itself and the
Palestinians. First and foremost, Israel’s efforts to secure its streets may
require hot pursuit into Palestinian-controlled areas, a justifiable
practice with which Americans can sympathize.
A
key element of peace is compliance with agreements already signed.
Therefore, Israel has the right to insist on compliance, including closing
Orient House and disbanding Jibril Rujoub’s operatives in Jerusalem.
Moreover, Israel and the United States can establish a
Joint Compliance Monitoring Committee to
study periodically whether the PLO meets minimum standards of compliance,
authority and responsibility, human rights, and judicial and fiduciary
accountability.
TEXT
We believe that the Palestinian Authority must be held to the same
minimal standards of accountability as other recipients of U.S. foreign
aid. A firm peace cannot tolerate repression and injustice. A regime
that cannot fulfill the most rudimentary obligations to its own people
cannot be counted upon to fulfill its obligations to its neighbors.
Israel has no obligations under the Oslo agreements if the PLO does not
fulfill its obligations. If the PLO cannot comply with these minimal
standards, then it can be neither a hope for the future nor a proper
interlocutor for present. To prepare for this, Israel may want to cultivate
alternatives to Arafat’s base of power. Jordan has ideas on this.
To emphasize the point that Israel regards the actions of the PLO
problematic, but not the Arab people, Israel might want to consider making a
special effort to reward friends and advance human rights among Arabs. Many
Arabs are willing to work with Israel; identifying and helping them are
important. Israel may also find that many of her neighbors, such as Jordan,
have problems with Arafat and may want to cooperate. Israel may also want to
better integrate its own Arabs.
Forging A New U.S.-Israeli Relationship
In recent years, Israel invited active U.S. intervention in Israel’s
domestic and foreign policy for two reasons: to overcome domestic opposition
to "land for peace" concessions the Israeli public could not digest, and
to
lure Arabs — through money, forgiveness of past sins, and access to U.S.
weapons — to negotiate. This strategy, which required funneling American
money to repressive and aggressive regimes, was risky, expensive, and very
costly for both the U.S. and Israel, and placed the United States in roles
is should neither have nor want.
Israel can make a clean break from the past and establish a new vision for
the U.S.- Israeli partnership based on self-reliance, maturity and mutuality
— not one focused narrowly on territorial disputes. Israel’s new strategy —
based on a
shared philosophy
of peace through strength — reflects continuity with Western values by
stressing that Israel is
self-reliant, does not need U.S. troops
in any capacity to defend it, including on the Golan Heights, and can manage
its own affairs. Such self-reliance will grant Israel greater freedom of
action and remove a significant lever of pressure used against it in the
past.
To reinforce this point, the Prime Minister can use his forthcoming visit to
announce that Israel is now
mature
enough to cut itself free immediately from at least U.S. economic aid and
loan guarantees at least, which prevent
economic reform. [Military aid is separated for the moment until adequate
arrangements can be made to ensure that Israel will not encounter supply
problems in the means to defend itself]. As outlined in another Institute
report, Israel can become self-reliant only by, in a bold stroke rather than
in increments,
liberalizing its economy,
cutting taxes, relegislating a free-processing zone, and selling-off public
lands and enterprises — moves which will electrify and find support from a
broad bipartisan spectrum of key pro-Israeli Congressional leaders,
including Speaker of the House, Newt Gingrich.
Israel can under these conditions better cooperate with the U.S. to counter
real threats to the region and the West’s security. Mr. Netanyahu can
highlight his desire to cooperate more closely with the United States on
anti-missile defense in order to remove the threat of blackmail which even a
weak and distant army can pose to either state. Not only would such
cooperation on missile defense counter a tangible physical threat to
Israel’s survival, but it would
broaden Israel’s base of support among many in the United States Congress
who may know little about Israel, but care very much about missile defense.
Such broad support could be helpful in the effort to move the U.S. embassy
in Israel to Jerusalem.
To anticipate U.S. reactions and plan ways to manage and constrain those
reactions, Prime Minister Netanyahu can formulate the policies and stress
themes he favors in language familiar to the Americans by tapping into
themes of American administrations during the Cold War which apply well to
Israel. If Israel wants to test certain propositions that require a benign
American reaction, then the best time to do so is before November, 1996.
Conclusions: Transcending the Arab-Israeli Conflict
TEXT: Israel will not only contain its foes; it will transcend them.
Notable Arab intellectuals have written extensively on their perception of
Israel’s floundering and loss of national identity. This perception has
invited attack, blocked Israel from achieving true peace, and offered hope
for those who would destroy Israel. The previous strategy, therefore, was
leading the Middle East toward another Arab-Israeli war. Israel’s new agenda
can signal a clean break by abandoning a policy which assumed exhaustion and
allowed strategic retreat by reestablishing the principle of preemption,
rather than retaliation alone and by ceasing to absorb blows to the nation
without response.
Israel’s new strategic agenda can shape the regional environment in ways
that grant Israel the room to refocus its energies back to where they are
most needed: to rejuvenate its national idea, which can only come through
replacing Israel’s socialist foundations with a more sound footing; and to
overcome its "exhaustion," which threatens the survival of the nation.
Ultimately, Israel can do more than simply manage the Arab-Israeli conflict
though war. No amount of weapons or victories will grant Israel the peace
its seeks. When Israel is on a sound economic footing, and is free,
powerful, and healthy internally, it will no longer simply manage the
Arab-Israeli conflict; it will transcend it. As a senior Iraqi opposition
leader said recently: "Israel must rejuvenate and revitalize its moral and
intellectual leadership. It is an important — if not the most
important--element in the history of the Middle East." Israel — proud,
wealthy, solid, and strong — would be the basis of a truly new and peaceful
Middle East.
Participants in the Study Group on "A New Israeli Strategy Toward 2000:"
Richard Perle, American Enterprise Institute, Study Group Leader
James Colbert, Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs
Charles Fairbanks, Jr., Johns Hopkins University/SAIS
Douglas Feith, Feith and Zell Associates
Robert Loewenberg, President, Institute for Advanced Strategic and Political
Studies
Jonathan Torop, The Washington Institute for Near East Policy
David Wurmser, Institute for Advanced Strategic and Political Studies
Meyrav Wurmser, Johns Hopkins University
The PNAC Full Spectrum Dominance for the NWO
"Rebuilding America's Defenses"
– A Summary Blueprint of the PNAC Plan for U.S. Global Hegemony
It is stunning that in
an age where there was relative peace and no longer a need for the global
military network of the US/NATO, that the demogues and Zionist would have
been allowed to proceed as they had. In fact they would not have had it not
been for 911 and the real reason for the continued military presence was
clearly in order to advance the interests of the Zionists in bringing about
the New World Order, run by the US and the Zionists
Written before the
September
11 attacks, and during political debates of the
War in Iraq, a section
of Rebuilding America's Defenses entitled "Creating Tomorrow's Dominant
Force" became the subject of considerable controversy. The passage suggested
that the transformation of American armed forces through "new technologies
and operational concepts" was likely to be a long one,
"absent some catastrophic and catalyzing
event – like a new Pearl Harbor."[45]
Journalist John Pilger
pointed to this passage when he argued that Bush administration had used the
events of September 11 as an opportunity to capitalize on long-desired
plans.[48]
Some critics went
further, asserting that Rebuilding America's Defenses should be viewed as a
program for global American
hegemony. Writing in
Der Spiegel in 2003, Jochen Bölsche claimed that Rebuilding America's
Defenses "had been developed by PNAC for Rumsfeld, Cheney, Wolfowitz and
Libby," and was "devoted to matters of 'maintaining US pre-eminence,
thwarting rival powers and shaping the global security system according to
US interests.'"[42][49]
British MP Michael
Meacher made similar allegations in 2003, stating that Rebuilding
America's Defences was "a blueprint for the creation of a global
Pax Americana,"
which had been "drawn up for" key members of the Bush administration.[50]
Academic Peter Dale
Scott subsequently wrote
“[PNAC’s] ideology was
summarized in a major position paper, Rebuilding America’s Defenses, in
2000. This document advocated a global Pax Americana unrestrained by
international law…”[51]
Other academics, such
as Donald E. Abelson and Phillip Hammond, have suggested that many of these
criticisms were overblown, while noting that similar statements about PNAC's
origins, goals, and influence "continue to make their way into the academic
literature on the neo-conservative network in the United States." Hammond,
for example, notes that while Rebuilding America's Defenses "is often cited
as evidence that a blueprint for American domination of the world was
implemented under cover of the war on terrorism," it was actually
"unexceptional." According to Hammond, the report's recommendations were
"exactly what one would generally expect neoconservatives to say, and it is
no great revelation that they said it in publicly-available documents prior
to September 2001."[52]
Similarly, Abelson has written that "evaluating the extent of PNAC's
influence is not as straightforward" as Meacher and others maintain," as "we
know very little about the inner workings of this think tank and whether it
has lived up to its billing as the architect of Bush's foreign policy".[53]
Focus on military
strategies, versus diplomatic strategies
PNAC fellow
Reuel Marc
Gerecht stated: "We have no choice but
to re-instill in our foes and friends the fear that attaches to any great
power.... Only a war against Saddam Hussein will decisively restore the awe
that protects American interests abroad and citizens at home"..[54]]
05/06/03: When the Bush administration started
lobbying for war with Iraq, they used as rationale a definition of
preemption (generally meaning anticipatory use of force in the face of an
imminent attack) that was broadened to allow for the waging of a preventive
war in which force may be used even without evidence of an imminent attack.
They also were able to convince much of the American
public that Saddam Hussein had something to do with the attacks of 9/11,
despite the fact that no evidence of a link has been uncovered.
Consequently, many people supported the war on the basis of 1) a policy that
has no legal basis in international law and 2) a totally unfounded claim of
Iraqi guilt.
What most people do not know, however, is that certain high
ranking officials in the Bush administration have been working for regime
change in Iraq for the past decade, long before terrorism became an
important issue for our country. In 1997 they formed an organization called
the Project for the New American Century (PNAC). They have sought the
establishment of a much stronger U.S. presence throughout the Mideast and
Iraq's Saddam Hussein has been their number one target for regime change.
Members of this group drafted and successfully passed through Congress the
Iraqi Liberation Act, giving legal sanctions for an invasion of the country,
and funneled millions of taxpayer dollars to Hussein opposition groups
called the Iraqi National Congress and The Committee for the Liberation of
Iraq.
The PNAC philosophy was
formed in response to the ending of Cold War hostilities with Russia and the
emergence of America as the world's only preeminent superpower. Claiming
that this is a "strategic moment" that should not be squandered, members of
PNAC say that America should use its position to advance its power and
interests into all areas of the globe. They believe the time is ripe for
establishing democracies in regimes considered hostile to U.S. interests and
are not hesitant to advise the use of military means to achieve those ends.
PNAC members on the
Bush team include Vice-President Dick Cheney and his top national security
assistant, I. Lewis Libby; Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld; Deputy
Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz; National Security Council member Eliot
Abrams; Undersecretary for Arms Control and International Security John
Bolton; and former Chairman of the Defense Policy Board, Richard Perle.
Other PNAC members exerting influence on U.S. policy are the President of
the Committee for the Liberation of Iraq Randy Scheunemann, Republican Party
leader Bruce Jackson and current
PNAC chairman William Kristol, conservative
writer for the Weekly Standard. Jeb Bush, the president's brother and
governor of Florida, is also a member.
Their campaign to
overthrow Hussein was unsuccessful during the Clinton presidency and early
days of Bush's term, but on 9/11 they found the event they needed to push
for the overthrow of Hussein. Within 24 hours both Wolfowitz and Cheney
were
calling for an invasion of Iraq, even before anyone knew who had been
responsible for the attacks.
Individuals who now
belong to PNAC have been influencing White House policy since the Reagan
era, calling for coups in Central America and claiming that a nuclear war
with Russia could be "winnable." Richard Perle is one of their most
prominent spokesmen. He and Michael Ledeen (of the American Enterprise
Institute), who is currently lobbying for war with Syria and Iran, have
adopted a stance that they call "total war" — the ability to wage multiple
simultaneous wars around the globe to achieve American ends. Recently Perle
commented on America's war on terrorism: "No stages," he said, "This is
total war. We are fighting a variety of enemies. There are lots of them out
there. All this talk about first we are going to do Afghanistan, then we
will do Iraq . . . this is entirely the wrong way to go about it. If we just
let our vision of the world go forth, and we embrace it entirely and we
don't try to piece together clever diplomacy, but just wage a total war . .
. our children will sing great songs about us years from now."
Members of PNAC are so
self-assured they are advancing America's best interests that they publish
policy papers specifically outlining their plans, plans that many fear may
be laying the groundwork for a third world war. Their ideas are peculiarly
atavistic, considering the friendly ties that have been forged between most
of the major nations during the past ten years.
Their central policy
document is entitled "Rebuilding America's Defenses (RAD)," published on
their website at
It outlines a plan for
American hegemony in the coming years, pinpointing "problem areas" of the
world and suggesting regime change of unfavorable governments so that
eventually the whole world will be unified under the banner of American
democracy.y.
Already we are seeing
evidence of PNAC influence on U.S. policy. For instance, the concept of
"Homeland Defense" comes straight from "RAD.Already we are seeing
evidence of PNAC influence on U.S. policy. For instance, the concept of
"Homeland Defense" comes straight from "RAD." Iran, Iraq and North Korea,
nations that George Bush calls the "Axis of Evil", are listed together in
"RAD" several times as possible military threats to the U.S. There is a
suggestion that military spending be increased to 3.8 percent of the GDP,
exactly the amount (over and above present expenses for the Iraqi campaign)
Bush has proposed for next year's budget. Its basic statement of policy
bespeaks and advocates the very essence of the idea of preemptive
engagement.
Bush's
National
Security Strategy of September 20, 2002, adopted PNAC ideas and
emphasized a broadened definition of preemption. Since we are already
hearing accusations against regimes in Iran and Syria, will they be slated
next for invasion? (This is a license to
commit Aggressive War)
The document is written
with all of the single-mindedness, unilateralism and inattention to
international ramifications (with either friend or foe) that the Bush
administration displayed in its current build-up for war with Iraq. There is
even assertion of the necessity of American political leadership overriding
that of the U.N. (p. 11), a policy that was sadly played out when the U.S.
invaded Iraq without the approval of either the U.N. or the international
community.
Rebuilding America's Defenses
(RAD)
I believe that
"Rebuilding America's Defenses" is a must-read for anyone concerned about
the future of our planet. Since the document is over 80 pages long I have
created a summary of its major ideas in order to make it more accessible.
Subject areas are
arranged under 4 categories:
A. Pax
Americana — outlining the rationale for global empire,
B. Securing
Global Hegemony — pinpointing regions that are considered trouble spots for
U.S. policy,
C. Rebuilding
the Military — plans for expansion of U.S. military might, and
D. Future Wars
of Pax Americana — the "RAD" vision of complete control of land, sea, air,
space and cyberspace.
As much as possible I
have used direct quotations followed by page numbers so that the reader can
consult the original. My personal comments are in italics.
For further reading
about the PNAC, see the following articles:
"It is not a choice
between preeminence today and preeminence tomorrow. Global leadership is not
something exercised at our leisure, when the mood strikes us or when our
core national security interests are directly threatened; then it is already
too late. Rather, it is a choice whether or not to maintain American
military preeminence, to secure American geopolitical leadership, and to
preserve the American peace" (p. 76).
The building of Pax
Americana has become possible, claims "RAD," because the fall of the Soviet
Union has given the U.S. status as the world's singular superpower. It must
now work hard not only to maintain that position, but to spread its
influence into geographic areas that are ideologically opposed to our
influence. Decrying reductions in defense spending during the Clinton years
"RAD" propounds the theory that the only way to preserve peace in the coming
era will be to increase military forces for the purpose of waging multiple
wars to subdue countries which may stand in
the way of U.S. global preeminence.
Their flaws in logic
are obvious to people of conscience, namely, 1) a combative posture on our
part will not secure peace, but will rather engender fear throughout the
world and begin anew the arms race, only this time with far more contenders,
and 2) democracy, by its very definition, cannot be imposed by force.
Following is the
preamble to the document:
"As the 20th century
draws to a close, the United States stands as the world’s most preeminent
power. Having led the West to victory in the Cold War, America faces an
opportunity and a challenge: Does the United States have the vision to build
upon the achievement of past decades? Does the United States have the
resolve to shape a new century favorable to American principles and
interests?
"[What we require is] a
military that is strong and ready to meet both present and future
challenges; a foreign policy that boldly and purposefully promotes American
principles abroad; and national leadership that accepts the United States’
global responsibilities.
"Of course, the United
States must be prudent in how it exercises its power. But we cannot safely
avoid the responsibilities of global leadership or the costs that are
associated with its exercise. America has a vital role in maintaining peace
and security in Europe, Asia, and the Middle East. If we shirk our
responsibilities, we invite challenges to our fundamental interests. The
history of the 20th century should have taught us that it is important to
shape circumstances before crises emerge, and to meet threats before they
become dire. The history of the past century should have taught us to
embrace the cause of American leadership" (from the Project’s Statement of
Principles).
Four Vital Missions
PNAC members believe
that there are four vital missions "demanded by U. S. global leadership,"
but claim that "current American armed forces are ill-prepared to execute"
these missions.
"Homeland Defense.
America must defend its homeland. During the Cold War, nuclear deterrence
was the key element in homeland defense; it remains essential. But the new
century has brought with it new challenges. While reconfiguring its nuclear
force, the United States also must counteract the effects of the
proliferation of ballistic missiles and weapons of mass destruction that may
soon allow lesser states to deter U.S. military action by threatening U.S.
allies and the American homeland itself. Of all the new and current missions
for U.S. armed forces, this must have priority.
"Large Wars.
Second, the United States must retain sufficient forces able to rapidly
deploy and win multiple simultaneous large-scale wars and also to be able to
respond to unanticipated contingencies in regions where it does not maintain
forward-based forces. This resembles the 'two-war' standard that has been
the basis of U.S. force planning over the past decade. Yet this standard
needs to be updated to account for new realities and potential new
conflicts.
"Constabulary Duties.
Third, the Pentagon must retain forces to preserve the current peace in ways
that fall short of conduction major theater campaigns. A decade’s experience
and the policies of two administrations have shown that such forces must be
expanded to meet the needs of the new, long-term NATO mission in the
Balkans, the continuing no-fly-zone and other missions in Southwest Asia,
and other presence missions in vital regions of East Asia. These duties are
today’s most frequent missions, requiring forces configured for combat but
capable of long-term, independent constabulary operations.
"Transform U.S.
Armed Forces. Finally, the Pentagon must begin now to exploit the
so-called 'revolution in military affairs,' sparked by the introduction of
advanced technologies into military systems; this must be regarded as a
separate and critical mission worthy of a share of force structure and
defense budgets" (p. 6).
"In conclusion, it
should be clear that these four essential missions for maintaining American
military preeminence are quite separate and distinct from one another – none
should be considered a 'lesser included case' of another, even though they
are closely related and may, in some cases, require similar sorts of forces.
Conversely, the failure to provide sufficient forces to execute these four
missions must result in problems for American strategy. The failure to build
missile defenses will put America and her allies at grave risk and
compromise the exercise of American power abroad. Conventional forces that
are insufficient to fight multiple theater wars simultaneously cannot
protect American global interests and allies. Neglect or withdrawal from
constabulary missions will increase the likelihood of larger wars breaking
out and encourage petty tyrants to defy
American interests and ideals. And the failure to prepare for
tomorrow’s challenges will ensure that the current Pax Americana comes to an early end" (p. 13).
On Usurping the Power
of the UN
"Further, these
constabulary missions are far more complex and likely to generate violence
than traditional 'peacekeeping' missions. For one, they demand American
political leadership rather than that of the United Nations, as the failure
of the UN mission in the Balkans and the relative success of NATO operations
there attests.
"Nor can the United
States assume a UN-like stance of neutrality; the preponderance of American
power is so great and its global interests so wide that it cannot pretend to
be indifferent to the political outcome in the Balkans, the Persian Gulf or
even when it deploys forces in Africa. Finally, these missions demand forces
basically configured for combat. While they also demand personnel with
special language, logistics and other support skills, the first order of
business in missions such as in the Balkans is to establish security,
stability and order. American troops, in particular, must be regarded as
part of an overwhelmingly powerful force" (p. 11).
On Preserving American
Preeminence
"Since today’s peace is
the unique product of American preeminence, a failure to preserve that
preeminence allows others an opportunity to shape the world in ways
antithetical to American interests and principles. The price of American
preeminence is that, just as it was actively obtained, it must be actively
maintained" (p. 73).
"America’s armed
forces, it seemed, could either prepare for the future by retreating from
its role as the essential defender of today’s
global security order, or it could take care of current business but
be unprepared for tomorrow’s threats and tomorrow’s battlefields" (p. i).
B.
Securing Global Hegemony
"In a larger sense, the
new president will choose whether today’s 'unipolar moment,' to use
columnist Charles Krauthammer’s phrase for America’s current geopolitical
preeminence, will be extended along with the peace and prosperity that it
provides" (p. 4).
"RAD" takes the posture
that only the U.S. should manipulate international relations and points out
"trouble spots" that may cause future problems, like Iraq, Iran, Korea and
all of East Asia. There is concern that several nations might come together
to challenge U.S. interests. Consequently any nation that produces nuclear
weapons or engages in significant arms build-up will be viewed as a
potential threat.
Iraq and the Persian
Gulf
"After eight years of
no-fly-zone operations, there is little reason to anticipate that the U.S.
air presence in the region should diminish significantly as long as Saddam
Hussein remains in power. Although Saudi
domestic sensibilities demand that the forces based in the Kingdom
nominally remain rotational forces, it has become apparent that this is now
a semi-permanent mission. From an American perspective, the value of such
bases would endure even should Saddam pass from the scene. Over the long
term, Iran may well prove as large a threat to U.S. interests in the Gulf as
Iraq has. And even should U.S.-Iranian relations improve, retaining
forward-based forces in the region would still be an essential element in
U.S. security strategy given the longstanding American interests in the
region" (p. 17).
"In the Persian Gulf
region, the presence of American forces, along with British and French
units, has become a semi-permanent fact of life. Though the immediate
mission of those forces is to enforce the no-fly zones over northern and
southern Iraq, they represent the long-term commitment of the United States
and its major allies to a region of vital importance. Indeed, the United
States has for decades sought to play a more permanent role in Gulf regional
security. While the unresolved conflict with Iraq provides the immediate
justification, the need for a substantial American force presence in the
Gulf transcends the issue of the regime of Saddam Hussein" (p. 14).
"Although the
no-fly-zone air operations over northern and southern Iraq have continued
without pause for almost a decade, they remain an essential element in U.S.
strategy and force posture in the Persian Gulf region.
Ending these operations would hand Saddam
Hussein an important victory, something any American leader would be loath
to do. Likewise, withdrawing from the Balkans would place American
leadership in Europe – indeed, the viability of NATO – in question.
While none of these operations involves a mortal threat, they do engage U.S.
national security interests directly, as well as engaging American moral
interests" (p. 11).
"In Europe, the Persian
Gulf and East Asia, enduring U.S. security interests argue forcefully for an
enduring American military presence" (p. 74).
"The Air Force presence
in the Gulf region is a vital one for U.S. military strategy, and the United
States should consider it a de facto
permanent presence, even as it seeks ways to lessen Saudi, Kuwaiti and
regional concerns about U.S. presence" (p. 35).
Axis of Evil
"It is now commonly
understood that information and other new technologies – as well as
widespread technological and weapons proliferation – are creating a dynamic
that may threaten America’s ability to exercise its dominant military power.
Potential rivals such as China are
anxious to exploit these transformational technologies broadly, while
adversaries like Iran, Iraq and North Korea are rushing to develop ballistic
missiles and nuclear weapons as a deterrent to American intervention in
regions they seek to dominate" (p. 4).
"The current American
peace will be short-lived if the United States becomes vulnerable to rogue
powers with small, inexpensive arsenals of ballistic missiles and nuclear
warheads or other weapons of mass destruction. We cannot allow North Korea,
Iran, Iraq or similar states to undermine American leadership, intimidate
American allies or threaten the American homeland itself.
The blessings of the American peace,
purchased at fearful cost and a century of effort, should not be so
trivially squandered" (p. 75).
East Asia
"Reflecting the gradual
shift in the focus of American strategic concerns toward East Asia, a
majority of the U.S. fleet, including two thirds of all carrier battle
groups, should be concentrated in the Pacific. A new, permanent forward base
should be established in Southeast Asia (p. 39).
"As stressed several
times above, the United States should seek to establish – or reestablish – a
more robust naval presence in Southeast Asia, marked by a long-term,
semi-permanent home port in the region, perhaps in the Philippines,
Australia, or both" (p. 44).
"Raising U.S. military
strength in East Asia is the key to coping with the rise of China to
great-power status. For this to proceed peacefully, U.S. armed forces must
retain their military preeminence and thereby reassure our regional allies.
"The prospect is that
East Asia will become an increasingly important region, marked by the rise
of Chinese power….A similar rationale argues in favor of retaining
substantial forces in Japan. In recent years, the stationing of large forces
in Okinawa has become increasingly controversial in Japanese domestic
politics, and while efforts to accommodate
local sensibilities are warranted, it is essential to retain the
capabilities U.S. forces in Okinawa represent.
Europe
"As discussed above,
the focus of American security strategy for the coming century is likely to
shift to East Asia. This reflects the success of American strategy in the
20th century, and particularly the success of
the NATO alliance through the Cold War, which has created what
appears to be a generally stable and enduring peace in Europe. The pressing
new problem of European security – instability in Southeastern Europe – will
be best addressed by the continued stability operations in the Balkans
by U.S. and NATO ground forces supported by
land-based air forces. Likewise, the new opportunity for greater
European stability offered by further NATO
expansion will make demands first of all on ground and land-based air
forces. As the American security perimeter in Europe is removed eastward,
this pattern will endure, although naval forces will play an important role
in the Baltic Sea, eastern Mediterranean and Black Sea, and will continue to
support U.S. and NATO operations ashore" (pp. 43-44).
"The Balkans, and
southeastern Europe more generally, present the major hurdle toward
the creation of a Europe 'whole and free' from the Baltic to the Black Sea.
The delay in bringing security and stability to southeastern Europe has not
only prevented the consolidation of the victory in the Cold War, it has
created a zone of violence and conflict and introduced uncertainty about
America’s role in Europe" (pp. 15-16).
"Despite the shifting
focus of conflict in Europe, a requirement to station U.S. forces in
northern and central Europe remains. The region is stable, but a continued
American presence helps to assure the major European powers, especially
Germany, that the United States retains its longstanding security interest
in the continent. This is especially important in
light of the nascent European moves toward an independent defense 'identity'
and policy; it is important that NATO not be replaced by the European Union,
leaving the United States without a voice in European security affairs"
(p. 16).
"Although U.S. Navy and
Marine forces generally operate on a regular cycle of deployments to
European waters, they rely on a network of permanent bases in the region,
especially in the Mediterranean. These should be retained, and consideration
given to establishing a more robust presence in
the Black Sea" (p. 17).
Regime Change
Several statements advocating the possible
necessity of removing hostile regimes can be found in the document.
"American military preeminence will continue
to rest in significant part on the ability to maintain sufficient land
forces to achieve political goals such as removing a dangerous and hostile
regime when necessary" (p. 61).
"The need to respond
with decisive force in the event of a major theater war in Europe, the
Persian Gulf or East Asia will remain the principal factor in determining
Army force structure for U.S.-based units. However one judges the likelihood
of such wars occurring, it is essential to retain sufficient capabilities to
bring them to a satisfactory conclusion, including the possibility of a
decisive victory that results in long-term
political or regime change" (p. 25).
"America’s adversaries will continue to resist
the building of the American peace; when they see an opportunity as
Saddam Hussein did in 1990, they will employ their most powerful armed
forces to win on the battle-field what they could not win in peaceful
competition; and American armed forces will
remain the core of efforts to deter, defeat, or remove from power regional
aggressors" (p. 10).
C.
Rebuilding the Military
"If an American peace
is to be maintained, and expanded, it must have a secure foundation on
unquestioned U.S. military preeminence"
(p. 4).
One stated objective of
"RAD" is "to outline the large,
'full-spectrum' forces that are necessary to conduct the varied
tasks demanded by a strategy of American preeminence for today and tomorrow"
(p. 5). Much of the document is an elucidation of those missions and
includes specific recommendations about weaponry, deployment patterns,
increased personnel and defense spending.
"In sum, the 1990s have
been a 'decade of defense neglect'. This leaves the next president of the
United States with an enormous challenge: he must increase military spending
to preserve American geopolitical leadership, or he must pull back from the
security commitments that are the measure of America’s position as the
world’s sole superpower and the final guarantee of security, democratic
freedoms and individual political rights" (p. 4).
"Preserving the
desirable strategic situation in which the United States now finds itself
requires a globally preeminent military capability both today and in the
future. But years of cuts in defense spending
have eroded the American military’s combat readiness, and put in jeopardy
the Pentagon’s plans for maintaining military superiority in the years
ahead. Increasingly, the U.S. military has found itself undermanned,
inadequately equipped and trained, straining to handle contingency
operations, and ill-prepared to adapt itself to the revolution in military
affairs" (p. i).
The four core missions
of PNAC referred to below were outlined in section A. Pax Americana.
"To carry out these
core missions, we need to provide sufficient
force and budgetary allocations. In particular, the United States
must:
MAINTAIN NUCLEAR
STRATEGIC SUPERIORITY, basing the U.S. nuclear deterrent upon a global,
nuclear net assessment that weighs the full range of current and emerging
threats, not merely the U.S.-Russia balance.
RESTORE THE PERSONNEL
STRENGTH of today’s force to roughly the levels anticipated in the 'Base
Force' outlined by the Bush Administration, an increase in active-duty
strength from 1.4 million to 1.6 million.
REPOSITION U.S. FORCES
to respond to 21st century strategic realities by shifting permanently based
forces to Southeast Europe and Southeast Asia, and by changing naval
deployment patterns to reflect growing U.S. strategic concerns in East Asia.
MODERNIZE CURRENT U.S.
FORCES SELECTIVELY, proceeding with the F-22 program while increasing
purchases of lift, electronic support and other aircraft; expanding
submarine and surface combatant fleets; purchasing Comanche helicopters and
medium-weight ground vehicles for the Army, and the V-22 Osprey 'tilt-rotor'
aircraft for the Marine Corps.
CANCEL 'ROADBLOCK'
PROGRAMS such as the Joint Strike Fighter, CVX aircraft carrier, and
Crusader howitzer system that would absorb exorbitant amounts of Pentagon
funding while providing limited improvements to current capabilities.
Savings from these canceled programs should be used to spur the process of
military transformation.
DEVELOP AND DEPLOY
GLOBAL MISSILE DEFENSES to defend the American homeland and American allies,
and to provide a secure basis for U.S. power projection around the world.
CONTROL THE NEW
'INTERNATIONAL COMMONS' OF SPACE AND 'CYBERSPACE,' and pave the way for the
creation of a new military service – U.S. Space Forces – with the mission of
space control.
EXPLOIT THE 'REVOLUTION
IN MILITARY AFFAIRS' to ensure the long-term superiority of U.S.
conventional forces. Establish a two-stage transformation process which
INCREASE DEFENSE SPENDING gradually to a
minimum level of 3.5 to 3.8 percent of gross domestic product, adding $15
billion to $20 billion to total defense spending annually" (p. v).
"In general terms, it
seems likely that the process of transformation will take several decades
and that U.S. forces will continue to operate many, if not most, of today’s
weapons systems for a decade or more. Thus, it can be foreseen that the
process of transformation will in fact be a two-stage process: first of
transition, then of more thoroughgoing transformation. The break-point will
come when a preponderance of new weapons systems begins to enter service,
perhaps when, for example, unmanned aerial vehicles begin to be as numerous
as manned aircraft. In this regard, the Pentagon should be very wary of
making large investments in new programs – tanks, planes, aircraft carriers,
for example – that would commit U.S. forces to current paradigms of warfare
for many decades to come" (p. 13).
Army
List of recommendations
for modernizing the Army (see p. 23).
"American landpower
remains the essential link in the chain that translates U.S. military
supremacy into American geopolitical preeminence.
Air Force — Toward a
Global First-Strike Force
List of recommendations
for modernizing the Air Force (See p. 31).
"Although air power
remains the most flexible and responsive element of U.S. military power, the
Air Force needs to be restructured, repositioned, revitalized and enlarged
to assure continued 'global reach, global power'" (p. 31).
"A gradual increase in
Air Force spending back to a $110 billion to $115 billion level is required
to increase service personnel strength; build new units, especially the
composite wings required to perform the 'air constabulary missions' such as
no-fly zones; add the support capabilities necessary to complement the fleet
of tactical aircraft; reinvest in space capabilities and begin the process
of transformation" (p. 37).
"The ability to have
access to, operate in, and dominate the aerospace environment has become the
key to military success...
"A recent study done
for the Air Force indicates that a worldwide network of forward operating
bases….might cost $5 billion to $10 billion through 2010. The study
speculates that some of the cost might be paid for by host nations anxious
to cement ties with the United States, or, in Europe, be considered as
common NATO assets and charged to the NATO common fund" (p. 20).
Navy/Marine Corps
List of recommendations
for modernizing the Navy (See pp. 39-40).
List of
recommendations for modernizing the Marines (See pp. 47-48).
"The end of the Cold
War leaves the U.S. Navy in a position of unchallenged supremacy on the high
seas, a dominance surpassing that even of the British Navy in the 19th and
early parts of the 20th century. With the remains of the Soviet fleet now
largely rusting in port, the open oceans are America’s, and the lines of
communication open from the coasts of the United States to Europe, the
Persian Gulf and East Asia.
"Thus, while naval
presence, including carrier presence, in the western Pacific should be
increased, the Navy should begin to conduct many of its presence missions
with other kinds of battle groups based around cruisers, destroyers and
other surface combatants as well as submarines. Indeed, the Navy needs to
better understand the requirement to have substantial numbers of
cruise-missile platforms at sea and in close proximity to regional hot
spots, using carriers and naval aviation as reinforcing elements" (p. 46).
Overseas Bases
"As a supplement to
forces stationed abroad under long-term basing arrangements, the United
States should seek to establish a network of 'deployment bases' or 'forward
operating bases' to increase the reach of current and future forces. Not
only will such an approach improve the ability to project force to outlying
regions, it will help circumvent the political, practical and financial
constraints on expanding the network of American bases overseas" (p. 19).
"Further, improvements
should be made to existing air bases in new and potential NATO countries to
allow for rapid deployments, contingency exercises, and extended initial
operations in times of crisis. These preparations should include modernized
air traffic control, fuel, and weapons storage facilities, and perhaps small
stocks of prepositioned munitions, as well as sufficient ramp space to
accommodate surges in operations. Improvements also should be made to
existing facilities in England to allow forward operation of B-2 bombers in
times of crisis, to increase sortie rates if needed" (p. 34).
Nuclear Expansion
...."But what should
finally drive the size and character of our nuclear forces is not numerical
parity with Russian capabilities but maintaining American strategic
superiority – and, with that superiority, a capability to deter possible
hostile coalitions of nuclear powers. U.S. nuclear superiority is nothing to
be ashamed of; rather, it will be an essential element in preserving
American leadership in a more complex and chaotic world" (p. 8).
D.
Future Wars of Pax Americana
"Until the process of
transformation is treated as an enduring military mission – worthy of a
constant allocation of dollars and forces – it will remain stillborn" (p.
60).
"RAD" envisions a
future in which the United States is in complete control of land, sea, air,
space and cyberspace of planet Earth. It finds objectionable the limitations
imposed by the ABM treaty and urges a newer rendition of Reagan's 'Star
Wars' defense shield program. Three missions are seen as crucial.
1.
Global Missile
Defenses — "A network against limited strikes, capable of protecting the
United States, its allies and forward-deployed forces, must be constructed.
This must be a layered system of land, sea, air and space-based components"
(p. 51).
"The first element in
any missile defense network should be a galaxy of surveillance satellites
with sensors capable of acquiring enemy ballistic missiles immediately upon
launch" (p. 52).
"At the same time, the
administration’s devotion to the 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile (ABM) Treaty
with the Soviet Union has frustrated development of useful ballistic missile
defenses. This is reflected in deep budget cuts
2. Control of Space
— "RAD" advises instituting a new "Space Service" thereby escalating
U.S. military preparedness "from the theatre level to the global level" in
order to achieve worldwide dominance, both militarily and commercially.
"Much as control of the
high seas – and the protection of international commerce – defined global
powers in the past, so will control of the new 'international commons' be a
key to world power in the future. An America incapable of protecting its
interests or that of its allies in space or the 'infosphere' will
find it difficult to exert global political leadership" (p. 51).
3. Control of
Cyberspace — "Although many concepts of
'cyber-war' have elements of
science fiction about them, and the role of the Defense Department in
establishing 'control,' or even what 'security' on the Internet means,
requires a consideration of a host of legal, moral and political issues,
there nonetheless will remain an imperative to be able to deny America and
its allies' enemies the ability to disrupt or paralyze either the military's
or the commercial sector's computer networks.
"Conversely, an
offensive capability could offer America's military and political leaders an
invaluable tool in disabling an adversary in a decisive manner. Taken
together, the prospects for space war or
'cyberspace war' represent the truly revolutionary potential
inherent in the notion of military transformation. These future forms of
warfare are technologically immature, to be sure. But, it is also clear that
for the U.S. armed forces to remain preeminent and avoid an Achilles Heel in
the exercise of its power they must be sure that these potential future
forms of warfare favor America just as today’s air, land and sea warfare
reflect United States military dominance" (p. 57).
Strategy for
Transforming Conventional Forces
Space itself will
become a theater of war, as nations gain access to space capabilities and
come to rely on them; further, the distinction between military and
commercial space systems – combatants and noncombatants – will become
blurred. Information systems will become an important focus of attack,
particularly for U.S. enemies seeking to short-circuit sophisticated
American forces. And advanced forms of
biological warfare that can target specific genotypes may transform
biological warfare from the realm of terror to a politically useful tool"
(p. 60).
Army of the Future:
"Consider just the potential changes that might effect the infantryman.
Future soldiers may operate in encapsulated, climate-controlled, powered
fighting suits, laced with sensors, and boasting chameleon-like 'active'
camouflage. 'Skin-patch' pharmaceuticals help regulate fears, focus
concentration and enhance endurance and strength.
SEE DOCUMENT FOR FULL TEXT
Roger Barnett U.S. Naval War College
Alvin Bernstein National Defense University
Stephen Cambone National Defense University
Eliot Cohen Nitze School of Advanced International
Studies, Johns Hopkins University
Devon Gaffney Cross Donors' Forum for International
Affairs
Thomas Donnelly Project for the New American
Century
David Epstein Office of Secretary of Defense, Net
Assessment
David Fautua Lt. Col., U.S. Army
Dan Goure Center for Strategic and International
Studies
Donald Kagan Yale University
Fred Kagan U. S. Military Academy at West Point
Robert Kagan Carnegie Endowment for International
Peace
Robert Killebrew Col., USA (Ret.)
William Kristol The Weekly Standard
Mark Lagon Senate Foreign Relations Committee
James Lasswell GAMA Corporation
I. Lewis Libby Dechert Price & Rhoads
Robert Martinage Center for Strategic and Budgetary
Assessment
Phil Meilinger U.S. Naval War College
Mackubin Owens U.S. Naval War College
Steve Rosen Harvard University
Gary Schmitt Project for the New American Century
Abram Shulsky The RAND Corporation
Michael Vickers Center for Strategic and Budgetary
Assessment
Barry Watts Northrop Grumman Corporation
Paul Wolfowitz Nitze School of Advanced
International Studies, Johns Hopkins University
Dov Zakheim
System Planning Corporation
9-11/PNAC and Full Spectrum Dominance PNAC Goes Down
THE SITE WHICH HAS BEEN ON-LINE SINCE THE 90S HAS BEEN SUSPENDED. (A COINCIDENCE?) 4 The United States is growing ever more desperate in the Middle East and around the world as it is becoming increasingly clearer with each passing day, no matter how US officials attempt to portray their country as in control and relevant, that things have changed and the US is a “world superpower” in decline. Unfortunately that decline is not going to be a pretty one, especially for the Washington elites and the geopolitical architects that have brought upon the world the current war-on-terror-hyper-security-state-paradigm. These “planners” may have to finally account for the way they have run roughshod over international laws and norms and there is a danger they may lash out in irrational ways.
10252013 IMPORTANT NOTE: WHEN RESEARCHING FOR THIS ARTICLE I ACCESSED THE SITE OF
PNAC IT WENT DOWN FOREVER
911 The Main Players More Facts on 911 and Maurice Greenberg Again and Again
Former Saudi financier Khalid bin Mahfouz and
Saudi national Yeslam bin Laden have been other supporters of Osama bin
Laden, but also had close ties to the CIA. Bin Mahfouz, an important
former BCCI director, was in business with the CIA's Frank Carlucci and
George H. W. Bush.
Beginning in 1976,
Saudi intelligence chief
Prince Turki al Faisal and Saudi ambassador Bandar bin Sultan have had
an important and crucial relationship with CIA officers as Richard
Helms, Ted Shackley, George H. W. Bush and Frank Carlucci. Turki has
been caught running and financing terrorist networks. Bandar Bush,
through his wife, was tied to some of the 9/11 hijackers.
The
CIA Counterterrorist Center (CTC), under
later War on Terror fundamentalist Cofer Black, was aware from March
2000 and on that Nawaf al-Hazmi and Khalid al-Mihdhar had entered the
United States via Los Angeles, immediately after attending an Al Qaeda
conference in Kuala Lumpur, which the CTC was also aware of. The CTC
didn't put this pair on watchlists. Neither did it inform the FBI about
them. On its own the FBI figured out that these men were financed and
supported by a Saudi intelligence asset with covert financial ties to
the wife of Bandar Bush, a close friend of the Bush family.
The CIA CTC, FBI, or even the White House
should have been aware that other terrorist hijackers had come to the
United States by mid 2000, because ring leader Mohammed Atta and other
suicide pilots ended up taking lessons with two CIA-linked flight
schools. One flight school owner, a drug trafficker with the name Wally
Hilliard, reportedly was in direct contact with Bill Clinton, and to a
lesser extent with Saudi national Adnan Khashoggi.
Secretary of defense Donald Rumsfeld, a protege
of the CIA's Frank Carlucci, with his deep ties to the Saudi backers of
terrorism, clearly hid in his office while the 9/11 attacks were going
on, guaranteeing that no early shoot-down orders could be given against
any of the hijacked airliners. Cheney, acting outside of the
chain-of-command, somehow had been able to give very late shoot-down
orders himself.
Key members of the Trilateral Commission and
their closest friends had total access to the impact and collapse floors
of the North Tower, as well as to Building 7. Henry Kissinger, Maurice
Greenberg (CIA), Jeffrey Greenberg, Peter Peterson come to mind.
For years and sometimes decades key members of
the Trilateral Commission had been close to Joseph Kasputys, tenant of
the South Tower impact and collapse floors. In addition, pre-collapse
"pressure pulses" were seen coming from the offices of Kasputys'
company. Among these associates of Kasputys were Elliot Richardson
(Trilateral exec.), Peter Peterson
(Trilateral), John Brademas
(Trilateral), Frank Carlucci
(Trilateral; CIA), George Shultz
(Trilateral), Paul Volcker
(Trilateral exec.), Joseph Nye
(Trilateral exec.) and John Whitehead
(Trilateral). In addition, Suzanne Woolsey
(CIA) had also known Kasputys for at least a decade, while Clinton and
George H. W. Bush probably knew him too through the Committee for
Excellence in Government.
The Trilateral Commission had recruited the
tenants of the South Tower impact floors 79 to 82: Toru Hashimoto and
Toru Kusukawa. Paul Volcker (Trilateral chairman),
Vernon Jordan (Clinton advisor; Trilateral),
James Wolfensohn and Jacob
Rothschild had a particularly close
partnership with these men. Molten metal - most likely steel - was seen
flowing from this company's offices minutes before the collapse.
The Trilateral Commission members who
controlled the North Tower impact floors - Henry Kissinger, Maurice Greenberg,
Jeffrey Greenberg - were business
partners of Kroll, the primary security consultant to the Port
Authority and the World Trade Center Complex. One would expect this
to have given them access to the entire building, although we do not
know the exact details.
AIG, which controlled the North Tower impact
floors and had a strategic partnership with Kroll Associates, had major
ties not only to the State Department elite, but also to the CIA, MI6
and SAS.
The potential role of
David Cohen
having ran
the operation to bring down the towers is particularly intriguing.
Biography of Cohen: Protege at the CIA of
William Casey, Robert Gates
and John Deutch. CIA deputy director of covert operations 1995-1997. CIA
station chief of New York 1997-2000, which should have brought him to
the CIA office in WTC 7. Security risk consultant for AIG November
2000-January 2002, during which time he most likely worked closely with
AIG's partner firm Kroll Associates. January 2002-today: NYPD
intelligence chief, which allows him to monitor basically any
potentially subversive group in the New York area. Quite possibly Cohen
takes into account that terrorists and foreign government agents can
hide behind 9/11 Truth groups and investigators. Certainly it would be
nice to have an insider monitor these groups.
Joseph Kasputys, tenant of the South Tower's
impact and collapse floors, had various direct and indirect ties to the
Carlyle Group, both pre and post 9/11. Carlucci and former president
George H. W. Bush, both with a CIA background, were key individuals of
this company. Carlucci knew Kasputys for years before 9/11 through the
Committee for Economic Development and Bush almost certainly through the
Council for Excellence in Government. In addition, Kasputys' associate
Patrick Gross ran a company owned by the Carlyle Group.
Carlucci, Bush and James Baker met Shafig bin
Laden, an older half brother of Osama bin Laden, on the morning of 9/11
at a Carlyle meeting. Coincidence or not, it remains an interesting
fact, because it is entirely possible that Shafig bin Laden is yet
another Saudi with dual loyalties.
Since the late 1970s Bush and Carlucci were
close associates of Ted Shackley, a CIA officer who should be considered
the number one suspect in running the operation to kill Kennedy and of
carrying out some of the other most sensitive black operations of the
CIA.
Since 1998 Carlucci was serving on the board of
the U.S.-Cuba Trade Association, along with JFK and
World
Trade Center movie producer Oliver Stone. Another board member was
former CIA director James Schlesinger, who could also be found at MITRE,
the Center for Security Policy, the OSS Society, the AFIO, the Military
Order of the Carabao, the Defense Policy Board, etc. Trilaterals David
Rockefeller, Paul Volcker (Fuji Bank),
John Whitehead, Carla Hills (AIG) and
others also sat on the board. General Jack Sheehan was another
interesting name.
In the months before 9/11 Carlucci shared the
board of the National Endowment for Democracy with future 9/11
Commission vice chairman Lee Hamilton. Future 9/11 Commission chairman
Thomas Kean could be found at the NED's board some in the years prior to
the appointments of Carlucci and Hamilton.
Senators Bob Graham and Jon Kyl also served on
the board of the NED in 2001. Both were in contact with Pakistani
backers of Al Qaeda, along with CIA covert operations veteran and AFIO
member Porter Goss. On the morning of 9/11 these three men were having
lunch with an ISI general who reportedly wired $100,000 to Mohammed
Atta, the ringleader of the 9/11 hijackers.
Goss was reported to be a frequent visitor of
the Venice Airport in the mid 1990s from which drug trafficking
operations were ran. In the years before 9/11 the key hijackers were
trained at this airport, also by men associated with the drug trade, as
well as the CIA.
Goss and Graham were appointed to head the 9/11
Joint Intelligence Inquiry despite having a massive conflict of interest
due to their connection with a financier of the 9/11 hijackers and in
case of Goss, with the Venice Airport. Along with Senator Jon Kyl these
men were also among the most hawkish in Congress and the Senate.
Suzanne Woolsey, a Stanford and Harvard trained
psychologist, knew Joseph Kasputys, tenant of the South Tower's collapse
floors, since at least 1991 through the Council for Excellence in
Government. Her husband, James Woolsey, is the CIA man with the deepest
connections to the military-industrial complex and the largest amount of
post 9/11 neoconservative organizations. Woolsey knows Carlucci and his
wife has worked with John Deutch and Bobby Ray Inman in various
capacities. Through CSIS Woolsey has also been among the closest
associates of Henry Kissinger, Maurice Greenberg and Zbigniew
Brzezinski. In the years prior to 9/11 Woolsey also shared the board of
the CIA-linked H. Smith Richardson Foundation with Brzezinski and
Rumsfeld. In addition, through Crescent Investment, Woolsey had access
to Al Qaeda elements in Pakistan. Upon joining the AFIO honorary board
of directors in 2002, we know that Woolsey was also in close contact
with Helms, Shackley and other controversial CIA spooks.
Many persons mentioned in this article are
linked to child abuse networks. Is it possible that these prominent
people really live in a world that is different from ours when it comes
to the things they can hide and get away with?
The majority of key neoconservatives absorbed
in the Bush administration had been active in the Center for Security
Policy, a post-Cold War neocon continuation of the CIA and black
operations-linked
American Security Council . Drug
trafficking, death squads, false flag terrorist operations and
COINTELPRO were among the specialties of the old American Security
Council. How likely is it that the Center for Security Policy all of a
sudden disavowed these policies?
Trilateral Commission member George Shultz, a
protege of the Bechtels and the
Rockefellers, played a major role in
putting together the foreign policy team for George W. Bush. His own
protege, Condoleezza Rice, played a major role in these preparations. So
did Paul Wolfowitz, another more minor protege of Shultz.
John Diebold's voting machines were accused in
2000 and 2004 of swinging the elections towards George W. Bush.
Coincidentally John Diebold had been a close associate of the CIA and
liberal establishmentarians as Zbigniew Brzezinskisince the 1970s.
Through the Committee for Economic Development, Diebold had also come to
know Peter Peterson, Frank Carlucci, George Shultz and Joseph Kasputys
years before 9/11.
Most of the names mentioned here appear in
ISGP's
Superclass Index , which for 90 percent
was developed without 9/11 (or other conspiracies) in mind. The index is
just the sum of (mainly) influential private institutes various persons
have been involved with their lives.
9-11: A Trillion Dollar Coup d'etat: Timeline of the Key Events
A mountain of undeniable facts as laid out by the film Loose Change.
1. August 1997 FEMA's Emergency Response to Terrorism handbook depicts
the World Trade center in crosshairs.
2. In 1999 NORAD conducted hijacking exercises where planes were flown
into the Pentagon and the World Trade Center.
3. June 2000 DOJ releases a terrorism manual with the World Trade Center
in crosshairs again.
4. September 2000 the Project for a New American Century releases a
report called Rebuilding America's Defenses in which they state that
without an event such as a new Pearl Harbor the process of
transformation is likely to be a long one.
5. October 24, 2000 the Pentagon conducts the first in a series of
training exercises called MASCAL the pretext of which is a passenger
airliner, a Boeing 757, crashing into the Pentagon. Charles Burlingame
an ex Navy F-4 pilot who worked in the Pentagon participated in the
exercise before retiring to take a job with American Airlines, less than
a year later the American Airlines plane, a Boeing 757, that he was the
Captain of supposedly crashed into the Pentagon.
6. April 2001 NORAD plans an exercise in which a plane is flown
into the Pentagon but it is rejected as too unrealistic.
7. June 2001 new instructions are implemented to deal with intervention
in the case of a hijacking, part of it reads: " For all non-immediate
responses the DOD must get permission directly from the SOD. Donald
Rumsfeld.
Attorney General John Ashcroft begins flying only on charter jets due to
a threat assessment by the FBI.
8. July 4, 2001 Osama Bin Laden receives medical help at the American
Hospital in Dubai. While he is there he is visited by the local chief of
the CIA.
9. July 24, 2001 Larry A Silverstein signs a 3.2 billion dollar 99 year
lease on the entire World Trade Center complex, this was six weeks
before 9-11, part of the lease included a 3.5 billion dollar insurance
policy that specifically covered acts of terrorism.
10. September 6, 2001 suspicious trading of American Airlines stock
takes place.
Bomb sniffing dogs were pulled off the World Trade Center and security
guards were pulled of the twelve hour shifts that they had been working.
11. September 7, 2001 More excessive trading of American Airline stock
involving PUT options which means that people were betting that the
stock would fall.
12. September 10, 2001 more of the same. Newsweek reported that a number
of top Pentagon officials cancelled their flight plans for the next
morning.
Willie Brown the Mayor of San Francisco receives a phone call from Condi
Rice warning him not to fly the next day.
In Pakistan at a military hospital all of the urologists are replaced by
a special team in order to host Osama Bin Laden, who was well cared for
and looked after.
13. September 11, 2001 with most of the intercept aircraft on training
exercises in Canada and in the far North or sent far from Washington and
New York on training exercises, there were only 14 aircraft left to
guard the entire United States.
September 11, 2001 eyewitnesses claimed that the aircraft had no windows
and sported a round blue emblem on the nose. Others reported seeing
missiles and the presence of missile like mounting on the wings and the
underside of the planes.
9:38 Hani Hanjoor, a very unskilled pilot, executes a 330 degree turn at
530 mph descending 7,000 feet in 2.5 minutes to crash American Airlines
flight 77 into the ground floor of the Pentagon. Experts said it could
not have flown at those speeds without going into a high speed stall and
that at such high Gs the plane would have just fallen out of the sky.
All of the experienced air traffic controllers who watched the plane
that was supposed to be flight 77 maneuvering and turning believed that
it was a military fighter plane. All of the lights poles that flight 77
was supposed to have sheered of seemed to have just popped out of the
ground, under normal circumstances they would have ripped the wings
right off of the planes. If you look at the photos and listen to the
eyewitness accounts it is clear that a commercial airliner did not hit
the pentagon the damage was consistent with a missile strike. Although
the plane was supposed to have melted upon impact all of the bodies on
board were identified by the same forensic laboratory that identified
the non casualties in Pennsylvania. You get the idea. The only piece of
wreckage was part of a J3-8D turbojet engine from a US Air force A-3 Sky
Warrior. The few A-3s left are stored by Ratheon in Van Nuys California.
A diffuser case was also found not belonging to a 757. Through analysis
it is clear that a missile such as a Tomahawk was used to create the
damage.
9:59 The South Tower collapses in about ten seconds, 29 minutes later
the North Tower collapses in about ten seconds as well.
5:20 World Trade Center 7, a 47 story office building 300 feet away from
the World Trade Center collapses in under 6 seconds into a neat little
pile, while all of the buildings surrounding it were undamaged. These
are the first three building in history to collapse because of a fire.
The buildings came down in almost free fall speed, witnesses,
video-tapes and expert testimony make it clear the the world trade
center was demolished using controlled explosions that had been placed
in the buildings in strategic locations earlier and then detonated in
order to cause the buildings to collapse, some witnesses reported up to
six simultaneous explosions concurrent with the six support structures
of the buildings.
10:00 Cleveland Hopkins Airport was evacuated amidst fears that a
hijacked plane was about to land
10:06 Flight 93 was supposedly headed for the White House and crashed
into a field in Pennsylvania witnesses said there was nothing to be seen
at the crash scene and nothing that resembled an airline crash. The
debris that was found was able to be carried away by hand in several
plastic bags.
10:10 The sixty nine people on flight 1989, the first plane that landed
in Cleveland, were evacuated to the FAA HQ in two hours and twenty
minutes and later released.
10:45 The two hundred people on board flight 93 were evacuated to a
special NASA building in under thirty minutes and never heard from
again.
11:43 Cleveland WCPO a local television station in Cincinnati Ohio
reported that two planes landed at Cleveland Hopkins Airport due
to a bomb threat, United identified the plane as flight 93.
10:45 The two hundred people on board flight 93 were evacuated to a
special NASA building in under thirty minutes and then all of them were
killed as were many of their family members and loved ones.
October 12, 2001 Donald Rumsfeld, in an interveiw with Parade Magazine,
mentions a missle that damged the world trade center even though
offically one was never mentioned
Bin Laden's original statement: "The U.S. government has consistently
blamed me for being behind every attack. I would like to assure the
world that I did not plan the recent attacks, which seems to have been
planned by people for personal reasons. I have been living in the
Islamic emirate of Afghanistan and following its leaders' rules. The
current leader does not allow me to exercise such operations."
April 10, 2003 Chicago O'Hare: flight 93 is spotted its tail number
N591UA is spotted on flight 1111. According to the FAA N612UA the
Pentagon plane and N591UA, the Pennsylvania plane, are still valid
numbers.
9 of the 19 hijackers are still alive and well.
The Bin Laden confession tape was a fake.
Motives
Why?: Silverstein demanded 7.2 billion dollars from his
insurers. Received 2.2b
Stocks 2.5 million in profits remains unclaimed.
Convar states that there is suspicion that some people had advance
knowledge of the time of the crashes in order to move out amounts
exceeding $100 million.
$160 billion dollars in gold but only $200 million was found in an empty
ten wheeled truck with an empty escort of cars which had been abandoned
just before the tower collapsed fleeing the south tower.
After 9-11
Bush has had permission to do and say whatever he wants.
In order to fully understand, or even to simply begin to attain a limited
understanding of, the events that are taking place in the world today, one
must dig back to the days before the assassination of John Fitzgerald
Kennedy, although that may not be far enough, especially when one begins to
uncover the ties between the CIA and the Bush family.
To understand that relationship one must dig even further back to the
cooperation between Prescott Bush and the Nazis and yet one may find that
even that is not enough. Eventually through continual digging going back
through the pages of history we might end up with the genocide of the
indigenous people of North and South America, the Catholic Church's Doctrine
of Discovery, which facilitated the genocide of up to 400 million indigenous
people in the Americas, and even then we would just be starting to
understand the big picture.
Why are these past events important today? Because many of the events taking
place today are the direct results of those seemingly unrelated events. The
Doctrine of Discovery is still an active document and has never been
rescinded and gives the United States, Canada and other North and South
American countries their only true basis for legitimacy. The genocide of the
indigenous peoples of the Americas continues to this day and it was their
genocide that lay the very foundation of the United States of America. The
genocide was so complete that in modern times much of the world counts the
current generation of squatters in the Americas as the true owners of the
land. How then can the country be called legitimate and "democratic"?
The genocide of the American Indians was an inspiration for Adolph Hitler,
if not a model, and that dominance over one race and one people over another
led, albeit not directly connected per se, to the Pax Americana, the
delusional "American" belief in their own exceptionalism, the ghettoized
American racist state where one minority ruthlessly controls another and
finally organizations and bodies such as the Project for a New American
Century (PNAC), which laid out plans to achieve complete US global hegemony
in the current century with the aid of an event such as 9-11 to serve as a
catalyst for endless aggressive wars of domination.
Since the mass casualty event of September 11th 2001, according to former
general Wesley Clark, the United States and NATO have been engaged in a
campaign of actively destroying countries with the final goals being
military confrontations with the Russian Federation and the People's
Republic of China and their eliminations as influential world powers as laid
out by Zbignew Brzezinski.
The US goal of complete global dominance is clear and the attainment of that
goal through force has also been made transparent and was clearly laid out
by the PNAC. When we understand that the events in the Middle East, in
Africa and elsewhere are all part of a larger strategy then things begin to
make sense. If we understand that the Pentagon's global arm NATO has been
tasked with surrounding Russia militarily and placing its military
infrastructure directly on Russia's borders, then the apparent insanity of
what is happening un Ukraine begins to make perfect sense.
Adding the recent growth and developments of organizations such as the
Russian led Customs Union, ALBA, UNASUR, MERCOSUR, the BRICS and the
Shanghai Cooperation Organization to the devastated US economy on the verge
of complete collapse and waning US influence worldwide, it is clear why the
US is growing desperate.
The need for NATO to continue to terrorize the world into believing it is
under constant threat is also clearly needed in order to justify its own
continued existence, its global expansion and the continued robbing of
member countries of 8% of their GDPs annually. Thus NATO and the West
continue to demonize Russia and paint Russia as some kind of a threat when
Russia has literally done nothing but attempt to do business on an equal
basis, mediate peaceful conflict resolution and even provide humanitarian
aid globally and to NATO countries.
After the successful illegal invasion and breakup of Yugoslavia those in
power knew they were untouchable and 9-11 cemented that belief as the events
of 9-11 were used to launch multiple illegal wars of aggression and an
excuse for the US to behave with complete impunity worldwide. NATO also used
9-11 to expand globally.
Why did I mention the JFK assassination at the beginning? Because, I
believe, when we understand that that John Kennedy was assassinated by the
CIA and the military industrial complex for his refusal to "play ball" with
projects such as Operation Northwoods and that the Bush family played an
important role in the CIA at the time and continues to do so today, things
become much clearer as to who we are dealing with.
Operation Northwoods was a plot where passenger jets would be used in a
false flag mass casualty event to serve as a pretext for the invasion of
Cuba. 9-11 was also a mass casualty event that saw passenger planes used as
a pretext for the invasions of multiple countries.
When we take into account that US geopolitical and military strategists are
not very creative and constantly repeat their "tried and true" methods, then
one must ask some serious questions about Malaysian Flight MH-17 and the
disappearance of Malaysian Flight MH-370.
The US doctrine of Full Spectrum Dominance, which emerged recently,
envisages unchallenged control and complete and total military and other
dominance of land, air, space, surface, sub-surface, the electromagnetic
spectrum and the information space (cyberspace) by the US. To achieve such
is unrealistic and the biggest challengers to such dominance are Russia and
China.
This Russia has been targeted, something made crystal clear by the
unprecedented anti-Russian war propaganda that has existed in the western
media at a ridiculously heightened level since the December coup in Kiev.
Ukraine and the Twisted Narrative
Since the first day protestors appeared on Maidan Square in Kiev,
US/CIA/EU/NATO meddling in the events taking shape was clear for anyone with
a critical mind and anyone who sought the truth. From the years of training
of the Right Sector to the civil society manipulations of USAID, the
(Pierre) Omidyar Network, George Soros' International Renaissance Foundation
and the US Congress' National Endowment for Democracy it was clear from the
start who was behind the unrest.
With the appearance of US officials such as Victoria Nuland on the Maidan
and visits by octogenarian John McCain as well as released phone
conversations between Nuland and US Ambassador to Ukraine Geoffrey Pyatt as
they chose the line-up of the post-coup junta government further doubt as to
who was responsible were removed. But through a massive propaganda campaign
and the manipulation of the media somehow all of that has been obfuscated,
buried and hidden and everything has been turned around and Russia has been
made the culprit.
What is amazing is that not only Russia and its leader President Vladimir
Putin have been made to blame for the US orchestrated destabilization of
Ukraine, but the entire West has gotten away with placing sanctions on
Russia and further reaping economic windfalls at Russia's expense. What is
also amazing is that everything the US has done, either through its proxies,
advisors like the RAND Corporation or directly, in waging a punitive war
against the people of eastern Ukraine for the fabricated reason that they
spoke Russian, has been turned around and blamed on Russia.
Russia Forced to "Legitimize" the Junta
While attempting to negotiate with those running the country in Ukraine and
because there is no one else to negotiate with, Russia has been forced to
grant a tinge of legitimacy to those who came to power as a result of an
armed coup or a sham election, further emboldening the West and
unfortunately adding to the spiral of illegality and manipulation by the
US/CIA/NATO/EU in Ukraine.
Even the downing of Malaysian Flight MH-17 has somehow been blamed on
Russia. This is despite the fact that no investigation has been completed,
all of the irrefutable evidence that Russia has presented points to the
Ukrainian forces and the US' long history of orchestrating Operation
Northwoods type events has long been known.
Media Operations
No matter what Russia does it is evil, this is because the West must
maintain the narrative at any cost. As with the post 9-11 environment the US
has successfully eliminated almost every voice that spoke out against it.
Like Pierre Omidyar buying out control of the Snowden files, to the outright
killing of journalists exposing the truth in Ukraine, the US has shown it
will stop at nothing to manipulate the narrative. For the average American
things like re-branding the US backed Al-Qaeda off-shoot the Islamic State
of Iraq and the Levant into simply Islamic State (IS) or Blackwater into
Greystone may work, but for anyone with their eye on the ball the attempt at
obfuscation is obvious.
One thing is clear the US/CIA/EU/NATO are bent on continuing their war
propaganda against Russia at any cost and this is because they must maintain
a narrative to justify events that are yet to take place or have already
been planned by geopolitical architects such as Zbignew Brzezinski.
US/NATOUS/NATO Will Attack Russia from the 9th to the 26th of September
If the unprecedented war propaganda by the West against Russia is any
indication as well as open source intelligence and how the West has operated
in the past, then one might reach the conclusion that there is a high
probability that the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and the
United States of America will begin a war against the Russian Federation
between September 9th and September 26th 2014.
First of all during the period of September 15-26 NATO will be conducting
operation Rapid Trident in Ukraine with at least 200 Americans and 1,100
military personnel from other countries including: Azerbaijan, Bulgaria,
Canada, Georgia, Germany, Great Britain, Latvia, Lithuania, Moldova, Norway,
Poland, Romania, Spain, Ukraine and the United States.
Holding such an exercise is completely destabilizing and provocative in a
country where there is a fratricidal war taking place. The tragic scenarios
likely from such an event being held in such an environment are astronomical
in number, a fact surely known to NATO.
The most likely pretext for a war against Russia will be a CIA/NATO
orchestrated false flag mass casualty event. The most likely and obvious
event window being between Tuesday September 9th and Thursday September
11th. This will allow for the launch of operations or a declaration of war
to be carried out on the psychologically important date of September 11.
One possible scenario for a CIA/NATO false flag event before the beginning
of operation Rapid Trident would target the President of Ukraine and the
Verhovnaya Rada, thus eliminating most of the key CIA players in Ukraine and
those with direct knowledge of the CIA subversion and destruction of the
country.
Such an attack would clean up any loose ends the CIA may have in Kiev and
serve to terrorize into silence anyone else with knowledge of the
orchestration of the December coup, the overthrowing of the government, the
selling off of Ukraine's strategic assets, the training and funding of nazi
[sic] elements and all of the mechanisms used to subvert and manipulate
civil society. That is scenario one.
Scenario two might also be carried out between September 9 and 10 and may be
more probable because this scenario will allow the US/NATO to use nuclear
weapons against Russia, which is something they will need to conquer the
Russian Federation quickly and completely, not taking into account the
Russian response and assuming such a retaliatory strike will destroy those
countries from where the missiles are launched and not the US mainland.
Scenario two will be a mass casualty false flag event using a small nuclear
weapon and might take place at an event with a high concentration of
civilians in the west of Ukraine. This might be the case if the Kiev junta
is still needed by the CIA/NATO.
I would put forward that at this point Poroshenko, Yatsenyuk, Yarosh and the
rest of the junta have already served their purposes and it will be risky
and expensive for the CIA/NATO to continue to sponsor them and keep them
from talking until they reach old age. Therefore if they have been targeted
for termination, as would logically be the case, the nuclear event may take
place in Kiev itself and will involve hundreds of thousands if not millions
of casualties.
The complete destruction of Kiev would also be an important psychological
victory for the US/NATO as would the destruction of Moscow which would
signify their final victory. Destroying Kiev would serve as the penultimate
victory in US/NATO plans for the subjugation and control, if not the
destruction, of the Slavic people as well as obtaining all of the
territories and wealth of the Russian Federation.
Scenario three involves a mass casualty event during the Rapid Trident
exercises and would see high casualties among NATO personnel from
Azerbaijan, Bulgaria, Canada, Georgia, Germany, Great Britain, Latvia,
Lithuania, Moldova, Norway, Poland, Romania, Spain, Ukraine and the United
States. This would allow NATO to call into effect Article 5 of the NATO
Charter and launch a war against Russia with the full support of all NATO
members.
This mass casualty event involving NATO troops may also involve a small
nuclear weapon and will most likely entail the death of most of the NATO
troops involved in the operation as well as hundreds if not thousands of
Ukrainian nationals from western Ukraine.
All scenarios will be blamed on President Putin and the Russian Federation
and will serve as a pretext for a massive nuclear and air attack on Russia.
NATO will never start a ground war or a conventional war against Russia
because that will cost too many lives and would most likely fail.
Again these are possible scenarios and by publishing them I am hoping to
prevent what has become obvious as the US drive for war with Russia.
Reason to Worry
I remind you dear reader you are dealing with the same people who killed
almost 3,000 people on 9-11. You are dealing with the same people who downed
Malaysian Airlines Flight MH-17 as a failed pretext for war and you are
dealing with the same people who brought nazis to power in Europe in a proxy
war against Russia.
These people have destroyed country after country since 9-11. They have
funded, trained and armed secret armies of Islamists, such as the
ISIL-ISIS-IS and the Right Sector and Ukrainian nationalists. They are the
same snakes who have infiltrated and subverted the Russian media and
obfuscate their real intentions and confuse the world with constant lies,
false propaganda and complete media control.
These "architects" have unleashed nazis in Europe in 2014, continue to
subvert Russia and surround it with weapons and perpetually rebrand and
redefine themselves as well as eliminating anyone who gets in their way.
Just as they have transferred the blame for Ukraine on Russia, rebranded
Blackwater into XE, Academy and Greystone, Al-Qaeda into ISIL, ISIS and now
IS and successfully subverted, eliminated and silenced almost every
journalist or media outlet that risked exposing them, they will transfer the
blame for everything they do in the coming months on Russia. Because Russia
is the target and Russia must be destroyed. Next is China, but that will be
easy once Russia is taken care of.
Hopefully we can stop them and I am wrong but unfortunately I am not
optimistic.
John Anthony Robles II
John is a radio newscaster for Radio VR and a chief editor for the Rossiya
Sevodnya International News Agency and was a former columnist and
interviewer for the liquidated Voice of Russia, the predecessor of Radio VR.
He lives in Moscow Russia. He runs a website at
www.jar2.com.
911: advanced knowledge, MOSSAD,
CIA and the PNAC - By JAR2
6 July, 2013 08:34
The recent resurgence of information on the
existence of FEMA internment camps, revelations of total surveillance by
Edward Snowden, and several instruments of total power passed into law by US
President Obama, have forced many denizens of the internet and seekers of
truth, to take yet another look at what the world is becoming. Although
there is still time to fight it appears that there is little we can do to
stop the United States and its attempts to turn the world into a complete
and total Orwellian security state. For Americans the time to rise up may
have passed as plans for a mass uprising are already in place and include
prisons that will be able to house millions.
Post 9-11 takeover by the “shadow government”
Recently the existence of FEMA internment camps, or as some are calling them
“concentration camps”, once again as has been the case periodically since
9-11 and the creation of the Department of Homeland Security, has become the
focus of some of the world’s alternative media.
Usually such reports are dismissed and marginalized by the US Government
subservient “mainstream” media, and only alternative media or “conspiracy
theorists” such as Alex Jones or Jesse Ventura, are the only ones who have
the courage to report on the subject.
Since 9-11, when the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center in New York City
were intentionally imploded in a controlled demolition providing the, for
lack of better term, “shadow government”, with the catalyst they needed to
start a global war of domination and strip away the rights of Americans, the
existence of FEMA “Camps”, plans for the implementation of martial law, and
thousands of Draconian and Machiavellian moves by the US Federal Government
to strip away the rights and freedoms of Americans all on the basis of
security, have been the subject of much debate but even the exposure of
massive illegality and the waging of wars of aggression have not brought
caused a single individual to account for such egresses.
Silencing those who question 9-11
The shadow government has done everything they can to punish and silence
anyone who has questioned the events of 9-11. This first started with the
silencing and marginalizing of the entire 9-11 truth movement. A movement
based and founded on the simple observation that even a three year old child
could have made, namely that if you hit something on the side, it falls over
following the same path of force that the impacting object was following,
and it does not implode into its own footprint.
Immediately after the events of 9-11 questions began to be raised and
everyone from FBI agents to structural engineers got involved voicing very
credible, plausible and even concrete scientifically based evidence
questioning the official version, sadly everyone was eventually silenced,
marginalized and even killed.
One of the most reputable voices who stated that 9-11 was an inside job was
a man who died last year, Ted Gunderson, a 30 year veteran of the FBI who
was the Los Angeles Bureau Chief and had approximately 800 FBI Agents
working under his command. He was also most famous for handling the case of
the John F. Kennedy assassination and the death of Marilyn Monroe.
Before his death Mr. Gunderson openly questioned 9-11, gave talks on the
issue and also started to investigate the existence of FEMA camps. This was
one of the most troubling issues that he fought to get to the truth of until
his death and one that has to this day not been properly addressed by the
authorities or anyone in power.
Although the 9-11 Commission was the last instrument to silence the populace
and their questions on 9-11 there has been no official response to questions
about FEMA camps.
The entire post 9-11 paradigm
To understand the entire current post 9-11 world very uncomfortable
questions need to be asked and the evidence has shown that it all goes back
to Nazi gold, Preston Bush, and 40,000 Nazis who found refuge in the United
States after WWII.
Ronald Reagan, his Star wars, Aids and the “cleansing” of America of blacks
and homosexuals were just some of the steps of the plan.
Then came along Clinton and he began downsizing the military and closing
military bases. After all the Cold War was over and there was no need for
such a global military structure. This angered the military industrial
complex and along came Monica Lewinsky from the Pentagon to help get rid of
Clinton. Clinton fought back and was convinced to allow the military
industrial complex and the “shadow government” to invade Yugoslavia as a
test to the concept of aggressive war disguised as humanitarian
intervention.
The plan worked and to this day no one has had to answer for the aggressive
invasion and the breaking up of Yugoslavia nor for the slaughter and
genocide of the Serbs.
Post Clinton expansion, the PNAC and Bush
The “shadow government” and the military industrial complex had tasted the
“success” of the Yugoslavia operation and were hungry for more so a plan was
devised by the Project for the New American Century which would allow for
all of their goals to be fulfilled, global expansion, aggressive wars and
the subjugation of the American people, something that would require the
American Constitution to be, for lack of a better expression, flushed down
the toilet.
Their plan required a mass casualty event to serve as a catalyst and to
force the US populace into accepting the stripping of their liberties and
thus 9-11 was carried out. 9-11 was the catalyst, everything that has
happened since has been a part of their plan.
Obama and the continuation of the plan
Towards the end of the second Bush regime the dissent of the American
populace was growing, in particular the Liberal and minority populations so
the planners had to think of a way to silence the left and those who were
questioning their activities. The planners decided that installing a black
president who promised change would be the best way to deal with dissent and
for the most part it has completely silenced the left and everyone who would
otherwise protest, refusing to believe that a black president could be a
party to anything nefarious. However this is about installing a “Big
Brother” and Obama fits the bill. It is not important that his skin is dark,
this is about absolute power and control of the masses, race has no real
role, except when it comes to the end game.
FEMA, the Board of Governors and dealing with American dissent
All of the matters listed above have been well-documented and would each
require volumes to cover properly, however one area that has been under
reported and under investigated is FEMA.
FEMA stands for the Federal Emergency Management Agency and they are one of
the bodies that will control the entire United States after the
implementation of martial law if such an event is allowed to take place.
They will be under the head of the Department of Homeland Security, the
newly created Board of Governors and the President of the United States who
will become a new imperial power.
The Board of Governors was created under Obama and consists of 10 governors
who will rule and take power away from the governors of the states which
find themselves in the 10 regions which the United States has already been
divided into.
With the implementation of martial law the US military, FEMA, Homeland
Security, and the President will control the entire United States and anyone
who dissents will be dealt with according to the level of threat that they
are determined to pose.
Instruments of control
According to hundreds of reports FEMA has already built from 600 to 800
internment camps in the United States. Many of them have been documented,
recorded and filmed, however there has been no admission by the government,
nor explanation as to their purpose.
Even when confronted openly, even at the very facilities in question, the
response has always been denial. Many of the internment facilities are
supposedly already in use and are housing entire families and children,
these have been filmed. Yet despite obvious evidence that they are
essentially high-security prisons the authorities claim they are family care
centers and the like.
Information available from open sources and a large part of the independent
investigations by Ten Gunderson have allowed for some insight into the FEMA
camps, the fact that they exist and the way they will be used.
It is reported that all of the camps share several chilling characteristics
including access to railway infrastructure, high multiple fences with barbed
wire pointing inward, huge territories, airplane and/or helicopter access,
and the ability to house huge numbers of people including children. One
center which is in use was filmed for a conspiracy theory program by Jesse
Ventura and Alex Jones and has since been banned but has found a following
on the net.
According to conflicting reports there are centers that can house as many as
5 million people. According to Mr. Gunderson evidence one center exists on
an island off Alaska that is said to be capable of housing up to five
million people and would be impossible to escape from.
Some evidence, which cannot be proven, but is available on the internet
points to the installation of gas chambers, the stockpiling of massive
numbers of coffins and even a color coding system which calls for those
deemed “red” to be killed immediately, those marked “blue” to be
reprogrammed, and the least threatening “yellow” to be exterminated or set
free as they are useless and there are too many of them.
Legal framework
A bill called HR 645 has set up the legal framework for these camps to be
built in the United States and the way in which they may be used is
chilling. In the event of martial law entire segments of the population may
be interred in the camps.
One reason for the internment may be mass opposition to a US military
invasion, for example if the US decides to invade Central America. Another
may be a mass-uprising by the black population, or the perceived threat of a
possible uprising. In such an event African Americans may be interred.
These are just some of the plans in place and approved by Obama and the
current US Government and laid out in HR 645.What is chilling is that all of
these plans and instruments are in place and no one has been able to do
anything about it.
Other instruments of control
Almost all of the instruments of totalitarian total control are already in
place in the United and many have been finalized only recently. For example
the right to broadcast state created propaganda to the internal US
population, something I wrote about recently. This will allow for an
Orwellian Ministry of Truth to be created in the United States.
Edward Snowden has revealed the total surveillance infrastructure already in
place and being used under secret directives and in the name of security.
Uncontrolled fusion centers with no accountability have popped up all over
America to serve as command and control centers in the event of martial law
and to assist in identifying enemies of the state.
Billions of bullets have been ordered by the US Government in preparation
for massive unrest and the killing of American citizens, according to
reports on the web.
False flag terrorist attacks and the perpetuation of the terrorist threat as
a pretext for taking away liberties and freedoms and rights.
The war on journalists and whistle-blowers and the clamp down and monitoring
of the press have allowed them to control and deal with anyone who might
have access to the truth or who is able to connect the dots.
Drones and other new technologies have allowed for the monitoring, remote
assassination and spying on anyone anywhere in the world.
Extra judicial executions, indefinite detention, the cancellation of Habeas
Corpus rights and secret off shore prisons have all been in place for years
and are to be expanded on as no one has been able to stop these practices.
Total and complete surveillance, facial recognition, advanced profiling, and
the ability to accurately predict the movements of the populace allow for
the complete control of anyone they choose as a target.
Those with the proof silenced
If you have followed the cases of Julian Assange, Bradley Manning and Edward
Snowden and have taken an interest in the number of people with inside
knowledge that died mysterious deaths after 9-11, you might come to the
conclusion, as I have that Manning, Assange and Snowden have facts that they
have not released to the public and that point to collusion by the shadow
government into the events of 9-11.
Whether they know it or not, and it is quite possible the three of them are
not aware, they most definitely hold key pieces of the puzzle that would
unravel the “shadow government” and cause the collapse of the US system as
we know it. I would offer that this is the true reason for the way the US
Government has gone after these three individuals they way they have. It is
not merely some obsession of Obama’s.
Assange may know this and it may be contained in his famous insurance file,
which is why he is still alive. Snowden may know these things which is why
the US Government has gone so far and begged Russia not to give him a
“platform”. Unfortunately we do not know and can only guess but if it is and
they have been silent then we can only postulate that the information they
have may cause revolution and resulting mass casualties and a complete end
to the United States and the so called New World Order.
What can we do?
The only thing that can be done is to remove those who have taken over power
and to roll back everything that they have done to usurp the US Constitution
and international law. Will or can anyone do this? It is unlikely but we
have to keep exposing and questioning and demanding accountability.
The key lies with the American populace, if they rise up and refuse to allow
this to continue it can be stopped. But there is no will among the general
population to do so. Everyone has been cowed into submission and inactivity
by the endless mind controlling flow of propaganda being fed to them by
those in power.
I oversimplify here but those are the conclusions I have reached after
conducting hundreds of interviews and investigating these matters for over
15 years. There is no real terrorist involved in the “War on Terror” and it
is not a war “against” terror or terrorism, it is a war “using terror as a
pretext” and the target of that war is you, free thinking and independent
citizen of the world.
Invitation
I invite any official with solid and credible information regarding the
hundreds of FEMA camps in the United States, who can show that they are
really being built in case of a natural disaster, or who can prove that they
do not even exist to contact me and tell their side of the story.
9-11: advanced knowledge, MOSSAD,
CIA and the PNAC - By JAR2
6 July, 2013 08:34
The world’s mass media have recently
publicized the case of Susan Lindauer, a former CIA operative who was
arrested under the Patriot Act after she attempted to testify about 9-11 and
U.S. Government foreknowledge and involvement in the attacks of 9-11-2001.
The U.S. Government sent 5 FBI agents to her home and arrested her and then
attempted to administer psychotropic drugs to her and hold her without trial
or hearing.
Since 9-11 the mass media, in particular in
the U.S. has almost never publicized the plights of the thousands of voices
who have had evidence which runs contrary to the official version of 9-11.
The voices which have come out against the official narrative of 9-11 have
included structural engineers, respected scientists, military personnel,
professors, eyewitnesses, reporters, bloggers and countless in what can be
loosely termed the 9-11 truth movement.
For the most part anyone who has had anything
to say against the official narrative, no matter how well-founded or
researched or provable, has been marginalized, ignored, threatened or even
disappeared. Why the mass media is finally running with the story of a CIA
operative who was arrested on false grounds is a little odd at this late
date but it has thrown the cover up of the events of 9-11 back on the front
page.
According to various data and open source
intelligence there were perhaps upwards of 9,000 people secretly arrested,
detained or disappeared after 9-11 bring the toll on human lives and the
number of those affected adversely by the events into the tens of thousands.
This does not include those killed maimed or affected by the wars in Iraq
and in Afghanistan and in the entire “War on Terror”. Some say the events of
9-11 were planned as a catalyst for the entire post 9-11 environment and the
War on Terror paradigm, with its accompanying global militarization and the
spread of the surveillance state, as well as what has been effectively a war
on Islam.
1Susan
Lindauer claims that the events of 9-11 were planned by Mossad, something
that has been echoed by others, claiming that the events of 9-11 allowed for
the planned disintegration of Israel’s enemies in the Middle East and the
guaranteed U.S. military presence in the region. For the U.S. this has
allowed them to effectively take control of the resources in the oil rich
region one country after the other and served as a pretext for the military
takeover of the world.
For many years the timeline of the events
leading up to and subsequent to 9-11 have been one of the most clear and
unarguable pieces of evidence pointing to something terribly wrong with the
official U.S. narrative, coupled with scientific evidence and the controlled
demolition of building 7, an event which Larry Silverstein himself admitted
to ordering in an interview on the record.
Some of the key events related to 9-11 that
have been documented and proven are as follows:
1. August 1997 FEMA's Emergency Response to
Terrorism handbook depicts the World Trade center in crosshairs.
2. In 1999 NORAD conducted hijacking exercises
where planes were flown into the Pentagon and the World Trade Center.
3. June 2000 DOJ releases a terrorism manual
with the World Trade Center in crosshairs again.
4. September 2000 the Project for a New
American Century releases a report called Rebuilding America's Defenses in
which they state that without an event such as a new Pearl Harbor the
process of transformation is likely to be a long one.
5. October 24, 2000 the Pentagon conducts the
first in a series of training exercises called MASCAL the pretext of which
is a passenger airliner, a Boeing 757, crashing into the Pentagon. Charles
Burlingame an ex Navy F-4 pilot who worked in the Pentagon participated in
the exercise before retiring to take a job with American Airlines, less than
a year later the American Airlines plane, a Boeing 757, that he was the
Captain of supposedly crashed into the Pentagon.
6. April 2001 NORAD plans an exercise in which
a plane is flown into the Pentagon but it is rejected as too unrealistic.
7. June 2001 new instructions are implemented
to deal with intervention in the case of a hijacking, part of it reads: "
For all non-immediate responses the DOD must get permission directly from
the SOD. Donald Rumsfeld.
Attorney General John Ashcroft begins flying
only on charter jets due to a threat assessment by the FBI.
8. July 4, 2001 Osama Bin Laden receives
medical help at the American Hospital in Dubai. While he is there he is
visited by the local chief of the CIA.
9. July 24, 2001 Larry A Silverstein signs a
3.2 billion dollar 99 year lease on the entire World Trade Center complex,
this was six weeks before 9-11, part of the lease included a 3.5 billion
dollar insurance policy that specifically covered acts of terrorism.
10. September 6, 2001 suspicious trading of
American Airlines stock takes place.
Bomb sniffing dogs were pulled off the World
Trade Center and security guards were pulled of the twelve hour shifts that
they had been working.
11. September 7, 2001 More excessive trading
of American Airline stock involving PUT options which means that people were
betting that the stock would fall.
12. September 10, 2001 more of the same.
Newsweek reported that a number of top Pentagon officials cancelled their
flight plans for the next morning.
Willie Brown the Mayor of San Francisco
receives a phone call from Condi Rice warning him not to fly the next day.
In Pakistan at a military hospital all of the
urologists are replaced by a special team in order to host Osama Bin Laden,
who was well cared for and looked after.
13. September 11, 2001 with most of the
intercept aircraft on training exercises in Canada and in the far North or
sent far from Washington and New York on training exercises, there were only
14 aircraft left to guard the entire United States.
September 11, 2001 eyewitnesses claimed that
the aircraft had no windows and sported a round blue emblem on the nose.
Others reported seeing missiles and the presence of missile like mounting on
the wings and the underside of the planes.
9:38 Hani Hanjoor, a very unskilled pilot,
executes a 330 degree turn at 530 mph descending 7,000 feet in 2.5 minutes
to crash American Airlines flight 77 into the ground floor of the Pentagon.
Experts said it could not have flown at those
speeds without going into a high speed stall and that at such high Gs the
plane would have just fallen out of the sky.
All of the experienced air traffic controllers
who watched the plane that was supposed to be flight 77 maneuvering and
turning believed that it was a military fighter plane.
All of the lights poles that flight 77 was
supposed to have sheered of seemed to have just popped out of the ground,
under normal circumstances they would have ripped the wings right off of the
planes.
If you look at the photos and listen to the
eyewitness accounts it is clear that a commercial airliner did not hit the
pentagon the damage was consistent with a missile strike.
Although the plane was supposed to have melted
upon impact all of the bodies on board were identified by the same forensic
laboratory that identified the non casualties in Pennsylvania. You get the
idea.
The only piece of wreckage was part of a J3-8D
turbojet engine from a US Air force A-3 Sky Warrior. The few A-3s left are
stored by Ratheon in Van Nuys California. A diffuser case was also found not
belonging to a 757. Through analysis it is clear that a missile such as a
Tomahawk was used to create the damage.
9:59 The South Tower collapses in about ten
seconds, 29 minutes later the North Tower collapses in about ten seconds as
well.
5:20 World Trade Center 7, a 47 story office
building 300 feet away from the World Trade Center collapses in under 6
seconds into a neat little pile, while all of the buildings surrounding it
were undamaged.
These are the first three building in history
to collapse because of a fire. The buildings came down in almost free fall
speed, witnesses, video-tapes and expert testimony make it clear the World
Trade Center was demolished using controlled explosions that had been placed
in the buildings in strategic locations earlier and then detonated in order
to cause the buildings to collapse, some witnesses reported up to six
simultaneous explosions concurrent with the six support structures of the
buildings.
10:00 Cleveland Hopkins Airport was evacuated
amidst fears that a hijacked plane was about to land
10:06 Flight 93 was supposedly headed for the
White House and crashed into a field in Pennsylvania witnesses said there
was nothing to be seen at the crash scene and nothing that resembled an
airline crash. The debris that was found was able to be carried away by hand
in several plastic bags.
10:10 The sixty nine people on flight 1989,
the first plane that landed in Cleveland, were evacuated to the FAA HQ in
two hours and twenty minutes and later released.
10:45 The two hundred people on board flight
93 were evacuated to a special NASA building in under thirty minutes and
never heard from again.
11:43 Cleveland WCPO a local television
station in Cincinnati Ohio reported that two planes landed at Cleveland
Hopkins Airport due to a bomb threat, United identified the plane as flight
93.
October 12, 2001 Donald Rumsfeld, in an
interview with Parade Magazine, mentions a missile that damaged the World
Trade Center even though officially one was never mentioned.
Bin Laden's original statement: "The U.S.
government has consistently blamed me for being behind every attack. I would
like to assure the world that I did not plan the recent attacks, which seems
to have been planned by people for personal reasons. I have been living in
the Islamic emirate of Afghanistan and following its leaders' rules. The
current leader does not allow me to exercise such operations."
April 10, 2003 Chicago O'Hare: flight 93 is
spotted its tail number N591UA is spotted on flight 1111. According to the
FAA N612UA the Pentagon plane and N591UA, the Pennsylvania plane, are still
valid numbers.
9 of the 19 hijackers are still alive and
well.
Silverstein demanded 7.2 billion dollars from
his insurers. Received 2.2b
There is suspicion that some people had
advance knowledge of the time of the crashes in order to move out amounts
exceeding $100 million.
$160 billion dollars in gold vanished but only
$200 million was found in an empty ten wheeled truck with an empty escort of
cars which had been abandoned just before the south tower.
With the current PRISM and other revelations,
will people begin to question? The truth is so disturbing that the average
person does not want to accept it, but the truth is something that can not
be hidden forever and when the truth does finally come out it will shake the
world, or perhaps it may be too late.
Susan Lindauer, the former CIA operative,
knows that Bush and Cheney had advanced knowledge of 9-11 and the world is
now beginning to listen, perhaps this one clue will be enough to begin to
bring down the house of cards.
WE FOUND THE 9/11 PLANES! CIA Pilot Philip Marshall was Killed in a Black Op
- 04
A former pilot who had admitting to working for the CIA in the Iran Contra
affair and had written several books investigating the events of 9-11, was
found dead along with his children in what many are calling a Black
Operations hit, including former US National Security Agency Officer Wayne
Madsen. In an interview with the Voice of Russia’s John Robles Mr. Madsen
says the author was working on his fourth book which he said would expose
information that would be a bombshell and blow 9-11 wide open. The author
had been told that the key to solving 9-11 was at the “Boneyard” (the Marana
Air Field) in the US state of Arizona.
The events of 9-11 continue to be the subject of intense investigation and
Mr. Madsen reveals that he had talked to people who worked for the CIA, NSA,
Defense Intelligence Agency, and the National Geospatial Intelligence Agency
and they had all pleaded to testify about what they knew to the 9-11
Commission, but they were not allowed to. Why?
This is John Robles, I’m speaking with Mr. Wayne Madsen, he is the editor of
the Wayne Madsen Report in Washington DC. This is part 4 of an interview in
progress.
Madsen: What I was told is that two of his old colleagues from the Iran
Contra days had come to Phil Marshall and said you need to look down at the
Marana Air Field. That is going to help you solve the case of 9-11. So he
got this from people on the inside.
Robles: I see. Two questions regarding… (now that kind of makes it clear to
me a little bit) remember the rotor that they found in the Pentagon? They
said it was from a… I can’t remember the exact name of the plane, but it was
an old outdated jet, they said and when you just mentioned this "boneyard",
I thought where else could they find an old plane like that? Do you remember
that?
Madsen: Yeah, I remember, there were all kinds of problems with some of the
aircraft parts and there was also that piece of an aircraft they found
between two buildings in a narrow alleyway in Manhattan.
They were trying to say that that was missed for like 11 years, nobody ever
found it on 9-11, I mean the planes that hit the trade center . Yeah, I
mean, there is all these anomalies, sometimes people who question their
government’s official lines on these things are accused of being conspiracy
cooks and conspiracy nuts, but the people who come up with these government
explanations really are the real lunatics.
You’d have to be a fellow lunatic to believe their stories.
Robles: Yeah. I think any kid would tell you that, I always liken it to
this: I mean, you stand a pencil on its end, you hit it on the side, it is
going to fall over, it is not going to implode and collapse into its own
footprint. So there it is… even a ten-year old kid would tell you that there
is something wrong there.
Now, back to Mr. Marshalll, you think he was killed then? And they killed
his children as well?
Madsen: Well what I believe happened; I don’t think his children were
intended targets.
Robles: Of course, I mean. These people, they just come in, they wipe
everybody out it doesn’t matter.
Madsen: Yeah, I think because Phil Marshall normally..on a Thursday night or
Friday night his children would have been staying with his (soon to be)
ex-wife, the divorce was almost finalized, they also tried to say: “Oh, he
killed himself because of that”. But it was a very amicable divorce, he was
trying to help his wife out.
He actually had paid for her to go over to Turkey. She wanted to set up an
import business and start importing some Turkish products and sell them into
the various boutiques in Northern California, which there are many.
Calaveras County of course is a big tourist destination during the summer
months because the local vineyards, and Yosemite being close by. And so that
was that he was trying to do for her, she was out of the country so the two
kids would normally stay with her, because she was closer to their schools
where they attended and because she was out of the country, they were
staying with him.
So whoever would have been tracking Phil Marshalll’s routine would have
said: “Ok, it is Thursday night, he is there by himself”.
Robles: So, the kids were not supposed to be there.
Madsen: The kids were not supposed to be there and neither was the dog. The
dog belonged to the wife and he was taking care of the dog. And I’ve already
figured the dog was probably the first victim because it was a small dog,
Shih Tzu, one thing they are they are not a German shepherd..
Robles: Sure, they are not going to attack of course.
Madsen: Yes, they are going to make hell a lot of noise and then obviously
it was a professional hit. It was a professional hit. The crime scene that,
the whole scene had been laid out to kind of indicate… but there were some
real issues, like I talked to the first witness who found his body, he said
that he was lying on top of the Mac-10 and clearly that the bullet had
entered the left side of his head but he was right-handed. So you’ve got to
be pretty agile.
Again we have one of these cases where the bullet hole is in the wrong side
because what hand was preferably used, that happens a lot in these case.
Vince Foster comes to mind, that was the case with Vince Foster, Clinton’s
deputy counsel, they found him in a park outside of Washington, and
unfortunately the gun was in the wrong hand.
You get what you pay for, so I’m thinking whoever they hired was probably a
second string professional hitman, certainly not like the ones who killed
Kennedy, they were the bestmany interested parties had to offer.
Robles: I see. they screw up with the hands all the time. I remember the Bin
Laden video, remember that one? First, he said he didn’t do it, then he said
he did it and the video had his hands…
Madsen: Yeah, and the fat Bin Laden or the skinny Bin Laden or then it was
the Bin Laden whose… only his lips moved, it looked like a cardboard cutout,
reminds me an old cartoon called Clutch Cargo here where the only thing that
moved were the lips, I think there were human lips on like a still frame
cartoon spell. That is what they did, yeah.
Robles: Do you know anything about the Asteroids?
Madsen: I’m not certain.
Robles: The Asteroids were a team of assassins, they are supposed to be the
best in the world. I just wondered if you heard anything about them.
Madsen: Yeah, I have not heard them called that. I’ve heard of them, but you
don’t know how much of this is Hollywood. Hollywood influencing the reality
or vice versa.
Robles: I just wonder because their name hasn’t come up too much but
apparently with IMF and with some very complex assassinations their name has
come up a couple of times. I was just wondering if you had heard about them
since.
Madsen: I have not.
Robles: So, with Mr. Phil Marshall, I’d like to get your conclusion: is
there anything going to be done about that or that is it? Or they’ve
whitewashed it and it is gone… ?
Madsen: Yeah, I wrote about it and again there was a couple of local papers
out there, they really seem to have a problem with Marshall really attacking
his credibility. I’m not surprised by that kind of thing. I wrote my piece.
But you know, if there is ever any new development in the case I would
certainly be right on it.
Certainly I talked a lot to his friends and family that didn’t believe that
he took his life nor that of his children. But I have to say that, it is a
small town where he lived, out there in Calaveras County and just like any
small town there were gossipy people who said: “Oh, he was unbalanced”. But
I think the people I talked to were much more credible because they were
people who held government positions who he knew – he was not a
right-winger, he was not a
tea-bagger, the sheriff was.
As a matter of fact it looked like Phil Marshall supported Barack Obama,
even though there is no background that can indicate that.
Somebody worked with the CIA during Iran Contra and he was somebody who had
attended an inaugural party, he just had attended a week before he
supposedly shot himself and his kids.
Robles: I see. But the plane, since we are talking about 9-11, we were
talking about the Boneyard, Marana Air Field, what do you know about those
planes being sighted – the one that apparently hit the Pentagon and the one
that evaporated into that field in Pennsylvania? Their registration numbers
are still active, and they are spotted occasionally by plane spotters.
Madsen: In both cases... I’ve only spoke to one person who said he claimed
he actually saw the plane hit the Pentagon and that was from a distance,
that was from north Arlington, Virginia. So if you are looking at Washington
you have Pentagon and then you have the Potomac River and about maybe 3-4
miles north you have the Key Bridge that goes from Arlington over to
Georgetown in Washington.
And that person said they were basically on that bridge. I just don’t know
how you could have seen the Pentagon from there. I really had a problem, and
the person was a diplomat from an Arab country.
I’m not saying that because I don’t think Arabs tell the truth but I don’t
think this person was in a position. First of all to have seen the plane, as
he said he did, but also he was obviously trying to make it look like it’s
the government official story, especially the country he happened to be
from.
Robles: He wasn’t Saudi, was he?
Madsen: He was not Saudi but he was from another country, Arab country that
produces a lot of oil and natural gas. I’ll put it that way.
I don’t want to divulge something that he told me in confidence but I don’t
know if this is the truth, but anyway.
Really, I don’t know anyone who actually saw the plane hit, when we finally
saw a video of the Pentagon, you don’t see any plane. Nobody sees a plane
hitting the Pentagon.
So, there is a lot of..people said they saw the plane, one cab driver said
it veered off to the left but then a missile came inand that is what
actually struck the Pentagon.
But like David Copperfield who can make 10,000 people see something he wants
them to see, so this is playing tricks with the human mind.
When I was in Shanksville I talked to the coroner for that county, Somerset
County. And he went out there and when he did not find any body parts he
said: “Well you don’t need me here, I don’t see that a plane hit!”.
And the late mayor of Shanksville said the same thing, but he is deceased
now, they said he died of old age, I would like to see the autopsy on him.
But anyway that is what they both said.
Robles: If I could just jump back to the Pentagon for a minute, another
thing like the buildings imploding and collapsing into their own footprint,
right after, the lawn was untouched, the second story windows were intact,
all the windows where the wings would have been were intact. I mean, it was
either a missile or something small that went into this..
Madsen: Or a bomb that was already placed inside because there was
construction going on, or a bomb and a missile. And what happened?
The Pentagon is one of the most secured facilities on the planet and where
are all the videos? Either trained on the Pentagon or in that area? I mean,
the Virginia Department of Transportation cameras on the broads and that is
only for traffic purposes, that is not for security. The videos from the
Sheraton Hotel which is across the street, the video from the Navy Exchange
Gas Station, the video from the Mall in the parking lot which is there for
any crime purposes.
Robles: I’m sorry, the only part of the Pentagon that blew up- the office,
do you remember who was inside, the people that were killed? That section
that was hit? Do you remember what was going on in there.
Madsen: There was a major audit, it was the Defense Audit Service. Just the
day before, I think, Rumsfeld talked about a few trillion dollars missing
and they couldn’t account for it. And of course the Navy’s Worldwide
Intelligence Center was also taken out in that. What information might they
have had?
Robles: There was also, I think if I remember right, there was about from 6
to 8 people that were working on contingency plans for an attack on a World
Trade Center and the exact scenario that had been taken place in attack on
the Pentagon. I think there was even a room in there where they had a small
model of the Pentagon where it was hit by an airplane, and the World Trade
Centers.
Madsen: The 9-11 Commission didn’t look into any of this. I talked to people
who worked for the CIA, NSA, Defense Intelligence Agency, you name it, the
NGA that nobody has ever heard of (the National Geospatial Intelligence
Agency). I spoke to people from all these agencies, they asked to testify at
the 9-11 Commission, they pleaded to, and they were not allowed to by their
bosses, and these were very senior individuals. The 9-11 Report was written
before the actual Commission was even convened, just like the Warren Report
was written before they came to any conclusions.
You were listening to an interview with Wayne Madsen – the editor of the
Wayne Madsen Report in Washington DC.
William Blum: The US Only Cares About Expanding the Empire and Israel
The events of 9-11-2001 continue to be the subject of intense debate and speculation due to the US Governments failure to provide the people of the world with a plausible or believable explanation namely: why two steel framed skyscrapers collapsed and were pulverized into dust as they imploded into their own footprints at free-fall speed from a lateral impact that they were designed to withstand, why building 7 also collapsed due to "office fires" and how a 767 disappeared into a two meter in diameter hole in the Pentagon without damaging the lawn or even second floor windows. Attacks of this nature have been classified as "an indirect defensive attack" by author Len Bracken and in this case saw the United States attacking itself. For those who think these are all "conspiracy theories" Len Bracken cites Machiavelli as one figure who actually documented such tactics man many years ago. He spoke to the Voice of Russia about these matters and more blaming 9-11 on a group originally calling itself the Safari Club.
Hello, this is John Robles, I'm speaking with Mr. Len Bracken, he is the author of six books including the "Shadow Government: 9-11 and State Terror", he is also a specialist in international affairs and international relations, and an accredited journalist. This is part 3 of an interview in progress.
Robles:Do you think is really possible that a government could kill 3,000 of its own citizens as a pre-text to bring about a hyper-security state and a condition of endless war?
Bracken: Right. The wars in Afghanistan and Iraq and the establishment of the Department of Homeland Security, which probably will make the Gestapo look like some kind of Utopian Paradise when it's all over.
Robles:You think it's possible, you think that's realistic?
Bracken: Yeah, I do think it's possible, I think that, you know, you had people like Samuel Huntington with his book 'The Clash of Civilizations', there seems to be have been this idea that they would start this "War on Terror" to pick up where the Cold War left off.
And of course a lot of this all goes back to the thing that you brought up before, which is this Project for a New American Century. And of course, Bamford came back in another book called "The Pretext for War" where goes into a great detail about how misleading it was for the Bush Administration to try to link 9-11 to Iraq, and of course, a lot of this goes back to the thing that you brought up before which is this Project for a New American Century, so many of the people that were a part of that, are tied to (How can I put it?) neoconservatives around Leo Strauss at the University of Chicago, who believe in the "noble lie" that can justify any kind of action.
Robles:Len, I was wondering if you could tell me anything about an article which appeared, I believe it was in Newsweek, somewhere around the 15th of September (2001), and they said that the Pentagon had been forewarned, somewhere in this article, which went into… tied into other warnings that were apparently received by other officials and, for example, Condoleezza Rice and the Mayor of San Francisco and some other officials who apparently did not fly that day. Do you know anything about that?
Bracken:Right, the article in the September, 15th issue of Newsweek talked about many of the hijackers receiving training at secure US military installations but it also mentioned that senior Pentagon officials were told not to fly, and to cancel all airplane travel reservations on the day before the 9-11 attacks.
This was in the article and when fellow researchers of mine spoke with one of the authors of the article, a very senior journalist, he denied that this information was actually in the article. And then my friend in turn said: "Hey, it's right here, you can see with your own eyes that this is what it says" and then he said "Well, then that's not true". So he denied the veracity of his own article.
Now with regard to some of the training, probably the most notorious example involves a 24th year air force veteran, by the name of Lieutenant Colonel Steve Butler who was essentially the Dean of Students at the Defense Language Institute in Monterey, California and he said that one of the hijackers and its, this Saeed Alghamdi (difficult name to pronounce) was actually trained at his institute and main others as well and that this Saeed Alghamdi was actually one of the three hijackers who took flight trainings at the Pensacola Naval Air Station.
Then, of course, Colonel Butler was actually chastised and given some kind of disciplinary action on the basis of having made accusations, disciplinary measures were taken against him because he accused President Bush of knowing about the impending attacks and doing nothing.
Here is a quote from the letter that he wrote on May, 26th 2002 in theMonterey County Herald: "Of course President Bush knew about the impending attacks on America. He did nothing to warn the American people because he needed this war on terrorism."
Robles:Len, can you tell us a little bit of the background about the.. I believe, what was the official name of this school in Monterey? This was the school where they used to train spies. Can you give us some details on that?
Bracken: It was founded in 1946 with the first name being the Military Intelligence Service Language School, now it is called the Defense Language Institute, Foreign Language Center in Monterey, most people refer to it as the Defense Language Institute.
Robles:How many of these terrorists were there and what were they studying? English?
Bracken:My understanding is that there was at least one, this Saeed Alghamdi, could have been more and they were studying English as a second language.
Robles:Why would they need it?
Bracken: You know, that's a good question. I guess that they probably spoke some English but not well enough to further their fight training or whatever else they were doing.
Robles:Do you think it is still possible that these people are still around today? Do you think any of the hijackers are still alive?
Bracken:It is entirely possible but certainly the idea that people they said who committed these attacks probably were not the ones who did it. Because many of these people have been found still alive, yet the government said that they died in the attacks.
Robles:So who did it then?
Bracken: I go back to what I said before; I think it was a massive operation, massive intelligence operation involving several governments.
Robles:Do you think it is possible they were drones?
Bracken: I take all of the above approach to the technical questions; I think we should consider everything. I don't think we are not going to get definitive answers on any of them. That's not very satisfying but I think that that's the reality.
I just go back to sort of my theory, I think it was an indirect defensive attack with United States attacking itself.
It's a very interesting thing about conspiracies, in his discourses Machiavelli talks about six types of conspiracies and he says that an attack against one's own country is actually very easy to do and so you have it from a figure no less than Machiavelli, saying that, you know, someone in a position of power decides to attack his own country, that he certainly would be able to do that with relative ease.
It might be interesting to include, you know, when people talk about conspiracy theories and try to dismiss this type of thinking. These things have been around for a long time and you have political analysts of the stature of Machiavelli presenting his classifications of types of conspiracies actually.
Robles:Back to the language school, I believe the person you mentioned wrote a letter to some newspaper.
Bracken: Right. It was in May 26, 2002 inMonterey County Herald, I have portion of it here at hands and he said: "Of course President Bush knew about the impending attacks on America. He did nothing to warn the American people because he needed this war on terrorism."
So that was written by a 24-year veteran of the air force, Lieutenant Colonel Steve Butler who was the Dean of Students at the Defense Language Institute who said that Saeed Alghamdi, and perhaps other hijackers were students at the Institute.
Robles:He "neededthis war on terrorism", why do think that is?
Bracken: I think its feeling the vacuum created by the end of the Cold War, you had to have something to sustain the Defense Industrial Complex, which is sort of, to say it more accurately, it's probably a Military Intelligence Complex at this point, you might even call it a Military Intelligence Pharmaceutical Complex because a lot of drugs are being given to people that are involved in those operation, I believe.
Robles:Whether they are branch outing the pharmaceuticals or intelligence or military, I don't think it's important, it is the same shadow government, if you want to call them that.
Bracken:That was the title of book but unfortunately, I don't have the definitive list of those responsible, we can always keep looking but it's hard to really know exactly who is pulling the strings, who are the puppet masters?
Robles:Now, Len, your theory. What is your gut feeling, what is your theory who is behind this? What do you think really happened? In your gut, in your heart? Who do you think really did this?
Bracken: I think it's agroup, a sort of amorphous group, called the Safari Club. And this Safari Club started back in the 70s when they had the Church Committee looking into activities of the CIA.
It comprises Saudi Arabia, Israel and the United States primarily, could bring in other intelligence agencies, conceivably Pakistan in this event.
So the Safari Club came into being in order to prosecute just these kinds of things that would never be allowed by the parliaments and the Congress of the United States, the legislative bodies.
So that's my gut, that it was some kind of group, we'll call it the Safari Club, go back to the historical precedent, maybe it's no longer called that, probably it has another name, it is very easy to change names. But I think it was an alliance of intelligence forces in Saudi Arabia, Israel and the United States.
Robles:This is even beyond Black operations, isn't it? I don't even think that Black Operations Command would allow something like that to happen?
Bracken:I think it's in part a Black Opbut then it has a broader strategic… tactically a Black Op but strategically starting a massive war against terror.
Of course, you mentioned Al-Qaeda, and it was not long after the 2005, 7/7 bombings in London, that Robin Cook who was the former Foreign Secretary of Great Britain said that Al-Qaeda doesn't really exist, and that it is just a database for the CIA and then he passed away shortly after saying that.
Robles:I have heard thatrecently Al-Qaeda stands for "CIA Terrorist Database", isn't that correct?
Bracken: Well, that's what Robin Cook said. The former Foreign secretary of Great Britain said that.
Robles:Well, Al-Qaeda was begun, we know, in Afghanistan to fight the Soviet Union, Osama bin Laden got his start in that war, Osama bin Laden had a CIA code name of Tom Osman when he toured US military installations and was privy to weapons demonstrations and things like that. Many people probably don't know that.
The man who came up with that information Orlin Grabbe, he is no longer with us, he was forced to live in South America or some place after publishing that information, he died a few years ago.
So Saudi controlling Al-Qaeda, the US funding controlling Al-Qaeda and now let's look at Syria, 426 children killed as a pre-text for another aggressive military attack. What do you think about Syria?
Bracken:It's just a crime; it's like a slow motion crime. My heart goes out to everyone who is faced with this "foreign intervention", I wrote a general theory of Civil War, I would say that this is not a Civil war; this is most clearly a foreign intervention using the irregular troops to do it.
Robles:Non-state actors, right?
Bracken: Right.
Robles:President Assad, he said himself there are tens of thousands, he said, there are "tens of thousands" of imported foreign mercenary quote/unquote "jihadists", I don't know if you want to call them jihadists because, I mean, obviously they have economic interests and they are in their being paid, he said tens of thousands, it's almost beyond belief. And most people don't believe it, most people say, "Ah, it's some conspiracy theory, it can't happen", especially with what they are fed in the US media. The US media, even if they know this, many US reporters, they know this information but they can't talk about it because they will lose their jobs.
Bracken:There is an interesting connection… and we do depend on Russian media to a large extent to bring us some news, but there is an interesting tie-in between 9-11 and Syria and that is in the person of Thierry Meyssan who wrote the "Big Lie", which was probably the first book about 9-11 saying that it was an inside job and he has been doing some great reporting as well with his Voltaire Network about the events in Syria.
Robles:Len, let me ask you a question, a personal question, do you ever get afraid for your safety? Have you been threatened, have you been watched?
Bracken:Yeah, yeah. I get some warnings. And I try my best to walk a fine line, and we say what we can say, of course, here in the United States we have libel laws for the most part, I just addressed my accusations towards the collective statesmen, you know, you have to be very careful, well this is verbatim, my warning was that: "I had to be very careful with what I write", and I try to be very careful.
Robles:Who gave you that warning? Can you tell us?
Bracken:I can tell you that the same verbatim words were spoken to me twice by two different people in the course of one week when I was writing the book in the summer of 2002 and my apartment was opened, I would come home two days in a row and the front door would be open.
So I was given these very direct, but not too ominous messages, I would have to say that (How can I put it?), I was scared but, you know, I survived. I don't think I'm particularly brave, I'm not particularly brave, I would not be the first one to say that there is a lot of other people out there who have gone further with all of this and I think about somebody like a family member named Beverly Eckert who died in a plane crash herself, and she was one of those people who did not accept the money, and was trying to get to the bottom of what really happened.
CIA Controlled Explosives Found on 9-11 Doctor Ronald Cutburth
One of the most marginalized groups after the events of 9/11 were the scientists and the engineers who could actually prove the fallacy of the official version of those events. From false arrests to demonization, to outright murder after 9/11, there was an unprecedented campaign to silence anyone who went against the official version of those events. The evidence pointing to US Government involvement at the highest levels is wide-ranging, well-documented and proven, yet no investigation is allowed to be carried out and no official has or will be found guilty of one of the worst single acts of homicide in the history of mankind.
Although the Western media attempts to dismiss all talk of a concerted effort and inside plan, involving the events of 9/11 and everything that we have seen since then, the scientific evidence and the facts themselves, as well as all of the events that have occurred since September 11, 2001, point to something much more sinister and evil than most people are willing to accept.
It is the outright horrific nature of what has been occurring since 9/11 that forces normal civilized people to shake their head in disbelief in attempt to deny that such a plot is possible.
Professor Ronald Cutburth, a scientist who had access to secret data at Lawrence Livermore Labs, concerning explosives and nano-thermite, and other such projects, witnessed the CIA involvement with powerful high-tech explosives which have been proven to have been used on the buildings of the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001.
Mr. Cutburth believes that the new world order wished to take over the world and that what we are seeing now in Ukraine is just the next step before the goal of the destruction of the Russian Federation.
This is John Robles, you are listening to an interview with Dr.Ronald Cutburth. He is an Engineering Scientist and Intelligence Expert, and did his dissertation at the Lawrence Livermore Lab in the United States.
Robles:Hello Sir! How are you this evening?
Cutburth: Hello Russia! I wanted to talk to you to help Moscow and Russia. Things are getting dangerous nowadays, or more dangerous than people realize or expected. The new world order controls our news in America more strongly than what they said the Soviet Union controlled the news. We are blinded in America.
So, this whole thing of threat that are in Ukraine right now, it is all chain-connected to use the demolition of the World Trade Centers, as a means to get started, to kick off what they call the Arab Spring. It really started when they blew up the World Trade Center.
Robles:Can you tell us about some of the things you know, as an engineering scientist, some of the concrete inarguable evidence that the World Trade Center was blown up, that it was not the result of lateral impacts from aircraft?
Cutburth: No, it wasn’t. There is an organization that I belong to called Architects
and Engineers for 9/11 Truth. And there’s over 2,000 engineers and scientists in the organization. But we can’t get any hearing because of the controlled news media. They have such an iron fisted control of the news; we can’t get a new investigation.
The purpose of it was so they could make a war in Afghanistan, and then follow through with more wars and this builds their war machine, and made it possible for them to rob all these Arab countries. But also it helped cut down the strength of the Arab countries and helped Israel. People thought: “oh, see, maybe they helping Israel”. In reality, it helped the new world order come closer to being able to control the world. That is what it is more about. And so you could say: “well this is to help Israel along” - not really, because it puts now Israel in danger.
There is immense amount of evidence about the World Trade Center. I am writing an article right now for our organization proving that nano RDX was used to blow up the concrete.
Robles:Can you give some details about this material?
Cutburth: They talked about Livermore Lab. Well I have been at Livermore Lab, I designed with their research. And when I realized that it was likely true, that it was developed at Livermore Lab. It is called nanothermite and I found that also they’ve developed another one called nano RDX. RDX is supposed to be a high explosive. But now nano RDX, it could be 5 times stronger. It is almost like nuclear weapon material. And who would it be available to, is what I am looking at too. It would be available to only people involved at high levels and that would the CIA.
Robles:Can you tell us a little bit about your work at Lawrence Livermore Labs, which is one of the most top-secret facilities in the US?
Cutburth: Yeah, I was there as a designer, but while there I produced patentable ideas. It was the main issue of patent on laser optic hardware, high-precision lasers, for large lasers. And that was partly for isotope separation, nuclear material isotope separation. And then, they were so happy with my work, when I went back to work on my dissertation, they opened the doors for me and I was able to evaluate 200 of their programs and I have that in my dissertation, which is titled Operations Analysis of Engineering Science Permission, Lawrence Livermore National Lab. It is an important dissertation.
Now, I found the level of their skills was very, very high and one of the programs I did research was one called sol-gel. Now I find sol-gel is the heart of nanothermite, nano-explosives. It is extremely powerful. This nanothermite, nano RDX is perhaps 4 times stronger than regular RDX. It is like nuclear material.
Robles:Nano RDX it is called?
Cutburth: Nano RDX.
Robles:This was found at WTC?
Cutburth: No, the nanothermite was found there. They were not looking for a nano RDX. Nano RDX would be harder to find. It is a different chemical. They did find nanothermite and it was mixed in with all of the dust, it was all around those little place, so it ... but nobody will investigate that, even though we have scientists that proved that it was there.
So anyway, the key point about this though to me is that the only people who have the available, would be high level people in the American Government, mainly the CIA. I suspect that George Tenet, the CIA Director, was behind it. We see that … we hear a lot of stories about what all the things the CIA are involved. In fact, part of my research, one of my reports I found, I saw the comments that the CIA bothering them about censors of all kind. So it’s CIA connected.
Robles:I’m sorry – about censors?
Cutburth: The CIA is connected with the nano-explosives. So, tracking an investigation, even though there’s 2,000 engineers that can prove that it was done by explosives. We can’t get the investigation because of the new world order news media. The news media, they have the news totally closed up. This is worse than what they claimed the Soviet Union was, when you get this kind of murder. And that it stretches out is the basis of causing attacks all over the world, it is the basis for it, a million people dead now.
And so, we could see what was going to happen and I could see what was coming. When they got up to Syria I claimed that Putin won, he got the new world order stopped at Syria, I said that before he actually stopped them. Now the reason I knew he could do that…now, the military won’t say it, they said they don’t know why Obama backed off. It must be because Putin can sink our aircraft carriers now.
America has been busy. They made those aircraft carriers. We thought it was national defense, but they used them to attack a little country. So, the Russians, instead of spending all that money to develop the aircraft carriers, they just developed a super fast cruise missile that can sink them. And that fixed the story.
And that is very crucial, and that is important about the Russian aerospace defense theory – extremely highly-skilled and I saw a report. And, I like I said, I'm an intelligence expert; it’s also, it’s strategic planning. Another thing that has an advantage over them is that he was former KGB. But they do the scare stories saying: “oh he is dangerous, he is KGB”. And in reality he is a highly educated intelligence expert. I know what that is. I probably don’t have his skills or I don’t have the tools, but he is a highly-skilled intelligence agent.
So, that matters and that put him upfront, and that puts you out in the edge. But it is dangerous. So, now, when they can’t defeat him, they are going to destroy him with the news media. That’s what they’ve been doing.
I’ve done some research and I’ve found there are all kinds of Israel fronts on the news and new world order fronts on the news. There is a trace where they registered. And I warned Israel, and they better not count on the new world order protecting them, and it could get them destroyed, because Russia has to defend themselves. They are in a defensive position totally.
I’ll give you an example of the controlled news media. Think back, John McCain said in his campaign using Sara Palin, he got her to say: “Obama gets elected, Russia will invade”. So, then, what happens? They set it up so Russia has to invade in self-defense. So, this whole thing of gaining the Crimea, they had a very good reason, they didn’t invade, they were invited in.
Robles:This invasion stuff, it is all a lie. Russia has not and will not invade anything, and did not, and Russia did not annex Crimea. I just want to get this out again. The Crimean people, 98.6% of them voted in a completely peaceful democratic referendum. There were no tanks, there wasn’t what is going on now in eastern Ukraine.
Cutburth: Yes, I know all that, but what I'm driving at is the sequence of how this all happened, that they knew they would be setting Russia up.
Robles:And the timing, right after the Olympics, right. I mean they really just had to?
Cutburth: It was known a long time before then. They knew about it back, when John McCain was running for president in 2008. They knew they were going to be doing this in Ukraine.
Robles:Just like South Ossetia!
Cutburth: They knew about it back in 2008. That’s what I mean, how serious this is with the new world order and their strategic planning. They…You got to think, they used the destruction of World Trade Centers that was in the year 2001. Now given a long that was Goebbels but they used that for a sequence of operations of murder and slaughter all over the country that when finally got up to the infusion of their plan to set it up and make it look like Russia is attacking somebody. Russia is defending itself, totally.
Robles:These people they are killing people all over the world. You talking about 3,000 American civilians that they killed on 9/11. How many millions have been killed in the so-called war on terror, which was aggressive attacks on countries? Afghanistan never attacked the United States. Iraq never attacked the United States. They weren’t even involved in 9/11. So, who are these people?
Cutburth: The new world order has been around for centuries. It was called the illuminati and then it became the new world order. The new world order are homicidal maniacs, I believe. I made a list of the attacks they’ve been doing since Bosnia. They slaughtered people in Bosnia. Then, the next thing they had to come up with a new idea of how they could attack a lot of countries. And that was the World Trade Center destruction. That was the method. And they followed through with that method.
The next false attack was saying Iraq had weapons of mass destruction, which was a lie. And now, think about it – that was George Tenet who said they had weapons of mass destruction. And they proved he lied. Now, think about this – they never have gone back and arrested him. So when he lied about Iraq, then why not go back and see if he lied about the World Trade Center, because the thing about the FBI said that Osama Bin Laden did not do that. But they ignored that. They said: “oh no, it doesn’t matter, we’ll just say he did that anyway”.
Robles:At the beginning Osama Bin Laden himself denied that he did it, the real Osama Bin Laden. You called these people homicidal lunatics, murderous maniacs…
Cutburth: They find reasons to do genocide. I gave this list of the attacks in Bosnia. And I said OK, now we got up to Syria and they murdered people in Syria so they could attack. And I said: “now, Putin stop them there”. So, now they are going to be going to Ukraine, that’s where they are going to be slaughtering people next. And what did we get? Slaughter in Ukraine.
This is John Robles, you were listening to an interview with Dr. Ronald Cutburth. He is an Engineering Scientist and Intelligence Expert, and did his dissertation at the Lawrence Livermore Lab in the United States.
Thank you very much for listening, and we wish you the best wherever you may be
On Who Benefitted from the Events of 911 Professor Kevin Barrett
Interview with Dr. Kevin Barrett, Doctor in Arabic and Islamic Studies, and a Co-founder of the Muslim-Jewish Christian Alliance for Truth, he is also the owner of Truthjihad.com.
Today I would like to ask you some questions on 9/11. My first question is - who benefited from the tragic events of September 11 2001?
Well, it is very clear that the Muslims didn’t benefit. Why would any Arab Muslim extremist want to do something like 9/11, which tripled the American military budget and launched American wars of aggression against the Islamic countries. So the answer of course is that it was the exact enemies of the people who were blamed for 9/11, who benefited from 9/11, and that would be the neo-conservative authors of Rebuilding America’s Defenses, a documents put out by The Project for the New American Century just one year before the 9/11, calling for a massive increase in the US military budget, the launching of pre-emptive wars of aggression, especially in the Middle East, and in particular an effort to make the world safe for Israel in the Middle East. The two parties who benefited the most from 9/11 were the US military industrial complex and the hardliners in Israel.
There is a statement in the document you mentioned – that the US needed a new Pearl Harbour.
They said that to get the changes that they wanted - it wouldn’t happen without a quote: “Catalyzing event such as a new Pearl Harbor.” In the 1990s the US military did extensive psychological studies, they hired the world’s leading focus group expert to try to look at why Americans still hated the Japanese, and they found that Pearl Harbour had shattered American’s sense of invulnerability and that this had led to a sort of undying hatred, and that is what they wanted to replicate, to allow for an endless war of aggression against the Arab and Muslim peoples.
What are the key discrepancies in the official version?
Probably the most obvious one is the destruction of building 7, it came down into it’s own footprint at about 5.23 or so in the afternoon, for no discernable reason, there were only a couple of small fires in this building. There is no reason for that building to come down the way it did. There is absolutely no question that building 7 was a controlled demolition, and yet our government and its NIST, the National Institute of Standards and Technology, released a long-overdue report on building 7 a couple of years ago that claimed that the reason was ordinary office fires. It’s one of the most egregious cases of scientific fraud ever perpetrated. I mean anybody who takes a hard work at what happened to building 7 will have to admit that there is a huge problem in the official version of 9/11, and then they will look at the towers and discover that those too were controlled demolitions. We are talking about the most complex and sophisticated controlled demolitions that have ever been, even attempted, on this planet. So real experts did this, after a tremendous amount of planning and calculation and thought.
The plane that was supposed to have crashed in Pennsylvania, there was a television broadcast in Ohio that the plane had landed, had taxied to a NASA hangar and the people on board had been evacuated and no one has ever ever seen them again. Do you know anything about that?
There is a new member of Architects and Engineers for 9-11 Truth who is also an experienced pilot of these large airliners, and he is currently hiding in fear for his life in Pakistan, and in his statement, he states, flat out that the passengers on these planes were unloaded at Cleveland airport and killed, that is one very plausible hypothesis.
All right…the Pentagon…
Thierry Meyssan got it right in his book; L'Effroyable Imposture (9/11: The Big Lie) which came out in early 2002, and then he put “Hunt the Boeing” on his website, looking at these pictures of the Pentagon immediately after impact and you don’t see any evidence whatsoever of any plane crash there, and there is a little tiny hole in the first floor of the building…
And there is a broken window on the first floor, and that’s it.
But around the hole, the windows are actually unbroken, and then the lawn is unscratched. Now how can a plane go into that 20 foot hole and not break all the windows around it, not even any dents where the engines would have hit the building and not leave a scratch on the lawn? This plane is 40 some feet high, and it is just ridiculous to imagine that it could have gotten into that hole and not impacted the lawn and not left any marks where the engines were. There was very likely a bomb at the Pentagon, that went off at 9.31. Other witnesses agree that what happened was probably a bombing, April Gallop, who was injured, along with her baby, while working in the Pentagon, walked out of the hole and saw no evidence whatsoever of any plane crash and was taken to the hospital, and then surrounded by military guys, brow-beating her and telling her that there had been a plane crash. She is suing the Bush administration today for orchestrating the 9/11 attacks. If you look at the actual facts, they don’t add up, they don’t make sense, it was an insane idea to do this, they don’t care about any of this, because it was so shocking and terrifying that they were able to get the American people to swallow this insane story without even any evidence to back it up. We have strong evidence against them, and all we need is a subpoena-power-possessed investigation and this set of dominos will come down very, very quickly.
How has the world changed since 9/11?
It has changed for the worse, in so many ways. As I said the US military budget tripled, and that means that the amount of money that human beings are wasting on building technologies to kill each other is completely out of control and these bureaucracies of mass murder and lies have grown cancerously. So today the US economy is dead-in-the-water and it has been dead-in-the-water since September 2001, and that is the reason for the world economic crisis, the great exaggeration in military spending right here in the USA, what is changed is that we have gone from living in a reality-based world to living in an Orwellian nightmare world, of a boot-stomping-on-a-human-face-for-all-eternity, which is what we have been given post 9/11, and the only way to get back to some semblance of reality is to get to the truth of 9/11 and to establish the truth in court and for the history books.
Afghanistan, Iraq.. Would that have that all been possible without 9/11?
Absolutely not. You may recall that when Bill Clinton bombed the factory in Sudan, in retaliation for the Cole bombing he bombed the Taliban or supposedly al-Qaeda in Afghanistan, he was met with tremendous resistance, people said: Why are you killing all these innocent people in this nebulous retaliation for these nebulous events…so at that time the hands of American executive power were relatively tied. Today the President of the United States is just slaughtering people all over the world, he claims the right to murder, disappear and torture anybody including American citizens without any due process of law. So that has been the real change, I think, that they wanted to institute since 9/11.
The Boneyard
The Million Dollar Photograph(s)
I believe that it may be possible the above picture was taken before the plane cloaked
.JPG)
.JPG)
911: The Main Players and the MOSSAD Demolition Team
.jpg)
.jpg)
